Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Our study used human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping to assess the disease occurrence probability in women with a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) without histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).
Methods: This study investigated CIN2+ incidence in 1986 women from January 2005 to August 2016, including 1123 with LSIL who were histology-proven negative and 863 with LSIL who were histology-proven CIN1. Baseline high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) status was determined using the hybrid capture II assay (HC2), and HR-HPV genotype was determined using the HPV DNA chip test (HDC).
Results: Among 1986 women, the HC2 yielded positive results in 1529 (77.0%), while the HDC identified 1624 (81.8%). Thus, the overall HDC and HC2 agreement was 93.2%. Overall, 169 (8.5%) patients developed CIN2+. The 5-year cumulative CIN2+ incidence rates for HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-31, and HPV-33 were 11.8%, 9.9%, 16.3%, and 16.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that HPV-16 (HR 1.637, 95% CI 1.064 to 2.520, p=0.025), HPV-31 (HR 1.845, 95% CI 1.051 to 3.238, p=0.033), and HPV-33 (HR 2.272, 95% CI 1.235 to 4.183, p=0.008) were significantly associated with CIN2+ development.
Conclusion: Among women with LSIL, those who test positive for HPV-16, HPV-31, or HPV-33 may require more rigorous follow-up because of a higher CIN2+ risk.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004902 | DOI Listing |