A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Testing the rSCAN Density Functional for the Thermodynamic Stability of Solids with and without a van der Waals Correction. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

A central aim of materials discovery is an accurate and numerically reliable description of thermodynamic properties, such as the enthalpies of formation and decomposition. The rSCAN revision of the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-generalized gradient approximation (meta-GGA) balances numerical stability with high general accuracy. To assess the rSCAN description of solid-state thermodynamics, we evaluate the formation and decomposition enthalpies, equilibrium volumes, and fundamental band gaps of more than 1000 solids using rSCAN, SCAN, and PBE, as well as two dispersion-corrected variants, SCAN+rVV10 and rSCAN+rVV10. We show that rSCAN achieves accuracy comparable to SCAN and often improves upon SCAN's already excellent accuracy. Although SCAN+rVV10 is often observed to worsen the formation enthalpies of SCAN and makes no substantial correction to SCAN's cell volume predictions, rSCAN+rVV10 predicts marginally less accurate formation enthalpies than rSCAN, and slightly more accurate cell volumes than rSCAN. The average absolute errors in predicted formation enthalpies are found to decrease by a factor of 1.5 to 2.5 from the GGA level to the meta-GGA level. Smaller decreases in error are observed for decomposition enthalpies. For formation enthalpies rSCAN improves over SCAN for intermetallic systems. For a few classes of systems-transition metals, intermetallics, weakly bound solids, and enthalpies of decomposition into compounds-GGAs are comparable to meta-GGAs. In total, rSCAN and rSCAN+rVV10 can be recommended as stable, general-purpose meta-GGAs for materials discovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999476PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.2c00059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

formation enthalpies
16
materials discovery
8
enthalpies
8
enthalpies formation
8
formation decomposition
8
rscan
8
decomposition enthalpies
8
enthalpies rscan
8
formation
6
scan
5

Similar Publications