Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Many neurocognitive evaluations involve auditory stimuli, yet there are no standard testing guidelines for individuals with hearing loss. The ensuring speech understanding (ESU) test was developed to confirm speech understanding and determine whether hearing accommodations are necessary for neurocognitive testing.

Methods: Hearing was assessed using audiometry. The probability of ESU test failure by hearing status was estimated in 2679 participants (mean age: 81.4 ± 4.6 years) using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Only 2.2% (N = 58) of participants failed the ESU test. The probability of failure increased with hearing loss severity; similar results were observed for those with and without mild cognitive impairment or dementia.

Discussion: The ESU test is appropriate for individuals who have variable degrees of hearing loss and cognitive function. This test can be used prior to neurocognitive testing to help reduce the risk of hearing loss and compromised auditory access to speech stimuli causing poorer performance on neurocognitive evaluation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10947954PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.13552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing loss
20
esu test
16
speech understanding
12
hearing
8
ensuring speech
8
neurocognitive
5
test
5
loss cognition
4
cognition protocol
4
protocol ensuring
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To analyze the association between the risk of voice disorders and sociodemographic, work, and general health factors in urban and rural school teachers.

Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional, analytical study with 1705 teachers from urban schools and 202 from rural schools teaching elementary and high school in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The exclusion criteria were being retired or no longer teaching and/or not accepting to participate in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Congenital hearing loss is a significant health problem, with a worldwide incidence of >6 per 1000 live births. Late diagnosis will delay appropriate treatment, leading to potential neurodevelopment problems. Early diagnosis requires neonatal hearing screening, where one of the most used techniques is automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (aABR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Isolated Congenital Middle Ear Malformations: Comparison of preoperative 0.1 mm Ultra-High-Resolution CT and Conventional High-Resolution CT.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

September 2025

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (J.G., Y.L., S.G.) and Department of Radiology (N.X., R.T., H.D.,Z.Y., Z.W., P.Z.), Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Background And Purpose: Isolated congenital middle ear malformation contributes significantly to congenital hearing loss and growth problems. This study aims to compare 0.1 mm isotropic ultra-high-resolution computed tomography and conventional high-resolution computed tomography for assessing isolated congenital middle ear malformation, using surgical exploration as the gold standard.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The rapidly expanding commercial spaceflight (CSF) market has fueled increasing interest in spaceflight experiences among individuals without professional astronaut qualifications. Such individuals may present with a range of medical conditions that add uncertainties to medical preparation and risk assessment for spaceflight. As the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) working group of the Aerospace Medical Association Ad Hoc Committee on Commercial Spaceflight, we conducted a scoping review to assess the available biomedical literature for ENT and neuro-vestibular conditions and physiology pertinent to spaceflight for nonprofessional space travelers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer screening nonadherence persists among adults who are deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH). These barriers span individual, clinician, and health care system levels, contributing to difficulties understanding cancer information, accessing screening services, and following treatment directives. Critical communication barriers include ineffective patient-physician communication, limited access to American Sign Language (ASL) cancer information, misconceptions about medical procedures, insurance navigation difficulties, and intersectional barriers for multiply marginalized individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF