Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

(1) Background: A pharmacist-led deprescribing service previously developed within the Consultation-Based Palliative Care Team (CB-PCT) was implemented for terminal cancer patients. (2) Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the developed deprescribing service for terminal cancer patients in CB-PCT. (3) Methods: A retrospective analysis compared the active care (AC) group to the historical usual care (UC) group. The clinical outcomes included the deprescribing rate of preventive medications, the proportion of patients with one or more medication-related problems (MRPs) resolved upon discharge, and the clinical significance. The implementability of the service was also gauged by the acceptance rates of pharmacists' interventions. (4) Results: Preventive medications included lipid-lowering agents, gastroprotective agents, vitamins, antihypertensives, and antidiabetic agents. The AC group revealed a higher deprescribing rate (10.4% in the UC group vs. 29.6% in the AC group, < 0.001). At discharge, more AC patients had one or more MRPs deprescribed (39.7% vs. 2.97% in UC, < 0.001). The clinical significance consistently had a very significant rating (mean score of 2.96 out of 4). Acceptance rates were notably higher in the AC group (30.0% vs. 78.0%. = 0.003). (5) Conclusions: The collaborative deprescribing service in CB-PCT effectively identified and deprescribed MRPs that are clinically significant and implementable in practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10706958PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237431DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deprescribing service
16
terminal cancer
12
cancer patients
12
palliative care
8
clinical outcomes
8
care group
8
deprescribing rate
8
preventive medications
8
clinical significance
8
acceptance rates
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study assessed the prevalence and incidence of potentially inappropriate medication use for older patients undergoing surgery and its association with polypharmacy.

Methods: A retrospective, population-based cohort study with patients ≥ 65 undergoing first surgery at Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland from 2005 to 2018. Participants were categorized by number of medications filled before and following their surgical episode into: non-polypharmacy (< 5), polypharmacy (5-9), and hyper-polypharmacy (≥ 10).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pain is a significant burden on individuals, healthcare systems and society. Analgesic drugs carry many therapeutic benefits; however, all drugs are associated with adverse effects and risk of harm. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids have been identified as particularly high-risk due to the risk of side effects and/or dependency.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale: Falls in care facilities are common events, causing considerable morbidity and mortality for older people. This is an update of a review on interventions in care facilities and hospitals first published in 2010 and updated in 2012 and 2018 on interventions in care facilities and hospitals. This review has now been split into separate reviews for each setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) remains common in the treatment of schizophrenia despite increased risk of adverse events and limited evidence of additional efficacy compared to antipsychotic monotherapy (APM). We conducted a nationwide, register-based cohort study to characterize APP among patients with schizophrenia in Denmark, 1997-2021. Patients were followed from year 3 after the schizophrenia diagnosis and onwards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Benzodiazepines (BZD) and nonbenzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics (Z-drugs) strongly increase the risk for hip fractures and should be avoided among older adults with a fall or fracture history. We assessed BZD and Z-drugs refill patterns after discharge for hip fracture among older US adults and explored factors associated with refilling.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (20% random sample) aged ≥ 66 years, hospitalized for hip fracture, and discharged home or to a skilled nursing facility.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF