Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have advance directives and living wills, despite the importance of advanced care planning (ACP) in end-of-life care. We aimed to understand the impact of an intervention to improve ACP documentation across race, ethnicity, and language on hospitalized patients at our institution.

Methods: We launched an intervention to improve the rates of ACP documentation for hospitalized patients aged >75 or with advanced illness defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. We analyzed ACP completion rates, preintervention, and intervention, and used interrupted time-series analyses to measure the differential impact of the intervention across race, ethnicity, and language.

Key Results: A total of 10,220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall rates of ACP documentation improved from 13.9% to 43.7% in the intervention period, with a 2.47% monthly increase in ACP documentation compared to baseline (p < .001). During the intervention period, the rate of ACP documentation increased by 2.72% per month for non-Hispanic White patients (p < .001), by 1.84% per month for Latinx patients (p < .001), and by 1.9% per month for Black patients (p < .001). Differences in the intervention trends between non-Hispanic White and Latinx patients (p = .04) and Black patients (p = .04) were significant.

Conclusions: An intervention designed to improve ACP documentation in hospitalized patients widened a disparity across race and ethnicity with Latinx and Black patients having lower rates of improvement. Our findings reinforce the need to measure the impact of quality improvement interventions on existing health disparities and to implement specific strategies to prevent worsening disparities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13248DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acp documentation
16
race ethnicity
12
intervention improve
12
ethnicity language
8
impact intervention
8
hospitalized patients
8
rates acp
8
intervention
6
acp
6
documentation
5

Similar Publications

Communication skills training alone has shown limited impact on improving the frequency and quality of serious illness conversations (SICs). Implementing structured support strategies may enhance both adoption and sustained use in clinical practice. Retrospective review of the impact of Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) training and implementation in outpatient and inpatient settings at a single academic center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) conversations happen infrequently even for patients with serious illness. Because patients are seen across settings, a unified approach to ACP is important in large integrated health systems.

Objective: To describe the structural and clinical process changes implemented by a large health system to improve and expand ACP for older adults.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A poor prognosis is an important trigger for advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but clinicians often overestimate prognosis.

Objective: To determine whether ACP note documentation increases by notifying inpatient physicians that a patient is at high risk of mortality.

Methods: A pragmatic cluster randomized trial at an academic medical center from September 2021 to December 2022 randomized attending physicians on the inpatient medicine team.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is a tool for optimizing end-of-life care and is an important aspect of healthcare for people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there may be disparities in access to ACP based on race and/or ethnicity.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of people with PD and care partners from a diverse academic Movement Disorders clinic regarding familiarity with ACP and sociodemographic factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.

Methods: The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF