98%
921
2 minutes
20
The Watch List (WL) is a monitoring program under the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) to obtain high-quality Union-wide monitoring data on potential water pollutants for which scarce monitoring data or data of insufficient quality are available. The main purpose of the WL data collection is to determine if the substances pose a risk to the aquatic environment at EU level and subsequently to decide whether a threshold, the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) should be set for them and, potentially to be listed as priority substance in the WFD. The first WL was established in 2015 and contained 10 individual or groups of substances while the 4th WL was launched in 2022. The results of monitoring the substances of the first WL showed that some countries had difficulties to reach an analytical Limit of Quantification (LOQ) below or equal to the Predicted No-Effect Concentrations (PNEC) or EQS. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) organised a series of workshops to support the EU Member States (MS) and their activities under the WFD. Sharing the knowledge among the Member States on the analytical methods is important to deliver good data quality. The outcome and the discussion engaged with the experts are described in this paper, and in addition a literature review of the most important publications on the analysis of 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, metaflumizone, fipronil, metformin, and guanylurea from the last years is presented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168707 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Patiala, IND.
Introduction The global rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a serious public health threat, reducing the effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics against prevalent bacterial infections. The mushrooming of Indian e-pharmacies, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, has improved public access to medicines, including antibiotics. However, the ease of availability, combined with an ambiguous regulatory framework governing e-pharmacies, may inadvertently encourage the irrational use of antibiotics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEClinicalMedicine
September 2025
Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Background: Antibiotic recommendations for pediatric infections in national standard treatment guidelines (STGs) vary widely, particularly for Access and Watch antibiotics. The WHO AWaRe book recommends Access antibiotics as first-line treatment for over 80% of common infections managed in primary healthcare. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between first and second-line antibiotics in national STGs with AWaRe book recommendations and the inclusion of these antibiotics in Essential Medicine Lists (EMLs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAC Antimicrob Resist
February 2025
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) and Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI) Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.
Objectives: In 2017, the WHO introduced the AWaRe (ccess, tch and serve) classification of antibiotics to support antibiotic stewardship (AMS) at local, national and global levels. We assessed the categorization of each of the antibiotics for systemic use for antimicrobial stewardship and quality improvement practice across primary and secondary care in the UK, proposing a nationally adapted UK-AWaRe classification.
Methods: A four-stage modified Delphi survey was conducted to review the AWaRe classifications in light of antibiotic resistance profiles, antibiotic use and stewardship practice in the UK.
J Nutr Educ Behav
August 2025
Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY.
Objective: To determine the feasibility of an online grocery pilot aimed at supporting healthy food purchases for caregivers of individuals with low income.
Methods: A pretest-posttest pilot study was conducted among 59 primary household food shopper caregivers living ≤ 130% of the poverty line. The 8-week randomized pilot had 4 groups: (1) free delivery-only, (2) trust-targeting SMS, (3) matching credit for online healthy purchases, and (4) grocery list recommendations.