98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Aims: Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is associated with high rates of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer [PCCRC], but further in-depth qualitative analyses are required to determine whether they result from inadequate surveillance or aggressive IBD cancer evolution.
Methods: All IBD patients who had a colorectal cancer [CRC] diagnosed between January 2015 and July 2019 and a recent [<4 years] surveillance colonoscopy at one of four English hospital trusts underwent root cause analyses as recommended by the World Endoscopy Organisation to identify plausible PCCRC causative factors.
Results: In total, 61% [n = 22/36] of the included IBD CRCs were PCCRCs. They developed in patients with high cancer risk factors [77.8%; n = 28/36] requiring annual surveillance, yet 57.1% [n = 20/35] had inappropriately delayed surveillance. Most PCCRCs developed in situations where [i] an endoscopically unresectable lesion was detected [40.9%; n = 9/22], [ii] there was a deviation from the planned management pathway [40.9%; n = 9/22], such as service-, clinician- or patient-related delays in acting on a detected lesion, or [iii] lesions were potentially missed as they were typically located within areas of active inflammation or post-inflammatory change [36.4%; n = 8/22].
Conclusions: IBD PCCRC prevention will require more proactive strategies to reduce endoscopic inflammatory burden, and to improve lesion optical characterization, adherence to recommended surveillance intervals, and patient acceptance of prophylactic colectomy. However, the significant proportion appearing to originate from non-adenomatous-looking mucosa which fail to yield neoplasia on biopsy yet display aggressive cancer evolution highlights the limitations of current surveillance. Emerging molecular biomarkers may play a role in enhancing cancer risk stratification in future clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad189 | DOI Listing |
World J Gastrointest Endosc
August 2025
Department of Endoscopy, 2 Academic Surgical Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece.
Screening colonoscopy with adenoma removal is the gold standard strategy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. Nevertheless, it remains an imperfect tool as nearly Twenty-five percent of adenomas can be missed during inspection by experienced endoscopists. Missed lesions are one of the primary reasons for post colonoscopy CRC and are associated with a significant variability in adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the most important quality indicator for colonoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Gastrointest Endosc
August 2025
Rural Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Port Macquarie 2444, New South Wales, Australia.
Background: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are premalignant polyps implicated in up to 30% of colorectal cancers. Australia reports high SSL detection rates (SSL-DRs), yet with marked variability (3.1%-24%).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCochrane Database Syst Rev
August 2025
Scientific Research Works Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.
Rationale: Early detection of colorectal polyps using colonoscopy is important for preventing post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) because a 1% increase in adenoma detection rate (ADR) is associated with a 3% decrease in PCCRC incidence. Linked color imaging (LCI) enhances color contrast compared to white-light imaging (WLI), potentially improving ADR. Existing reviews provide promising yet inconclusive findings on LCI's benefits, highlighting the need for this systematic review.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEndoscopy
August 2025
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford Big Data Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Background and study aims Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) represents a potential missed opportunity to diagnose or prevent colorectal cancer. This study aimed to create a standardised, nationwide audit system to determine why PCCRCs occur and to generate evidence to prevent them. Patients and methods PCCRCs occurring 6-48 months after a colonoscopy were identified from English national datasets and uploaded to a secure portal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Gastroenterol Rep
August 2025
University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Purpose Of Review: This review summarizes current landscape of colonoscopy quality metrics, with an emphasis on priority intraprocedural indicators. We aim to clarify the rationale, evidence, and practical implementation of both traditional and recently introduced metrics-highlighting which measures are most relevant for improving patient outcomes in 2025.
Recent Findings: The 2024 ACG/ASGE guidelines reaffirmed the core quality indicators of adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), bowel preparation adequacy, and guideline-based surveillance interval assignment.