98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Both bone forearm fractures are common injuries in children. Most can be treated with reduction and casting. Those that fail nonoperative management can be treated with a plate or intramedullary fixation; however, refracture remains a problem. The goal of this study is to evaluate the refracture rate in both bone forearm fractures based on the mode of fixation.
Methods: Institutional board review approval was obtained. A retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2021 at a single tertiary care institution was conducted for all operative patients <18 years who sustained a both bone forearm fracture. Groups were stratified based on initial operative fixation type: both bones fixated using nails, 1 bone fixated with a nail; both bones plated, and 1 bone plated. Further review was conducted to identify refractures following initial operative treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the χ 2 test of independence and Fisher's exact test.
Results: In all, 402 operatively treated both bone forearm fracture patients were identified. Two hundred fifty-six of these patients underwent intramedullary fixation (average age 10.3y/o), while 146 patients received plate fixation (average age 13.8y/o). Fracture location was similar across the nailing and plating cohorts, most often occurring in the mid-shaft region. Patients aged ≤10 years refractured at a significantly higher rate than patients aged >10 years across all operative fixation cohorts (12.5% vs. 2.5%, P <0.001). Among the 256 patients who underwent intramedullary fixation, 61.3% had both bones treated (n=157/256), whereas 38.7% received single bone fixation (n=99/256). Of the 146 plate fixations, 84.4% had both bones fixed (n=123/146), and only 15.8% were treated with single bone fixation (n=23/146). In the intramedullary group, 15 patients sustained refractures, 11 of whom were treated with single bone fixation (11.1%, n=11/99) versus 4 with both both fixation (2.5%, n=4/157). Among the plating group, 7 patients sustained refractures, 6 with both bone fixation (4.9%, n=6/123) and 1 in single bone fixation (4.3%, n=1/23). Refractures were found to be significantly more prevalent among patients treated with single bone compared with both bone intramedullary nail fixation (11.1% vs. 2.5%, P =0.006). By fixated bone, single bone ulna fixations had a higher refracture rate compared with both bone fixations (12.1% vs. 3.6%, P =0.003).
Conclusion: The overall refracture rate following operative treatment of both bone fractures is 5.5% and is similar between intramedullary and plate fixations. Overall, patients ≤10 years of age had a higher rate of refracture. Among single bone fixations, higher refracture was seen with intramedullary fixations, and when the radius was treated nonoperatively. Surgeons may be able to reduce the refracture rate by performing intramedullary fixation of both bones instead of only one bone. Effective postoperative counseling among younger patients may also decrease refracture rates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002552 | DOI Listing |
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Klinik für Hand‑, Replantations- und Mikrochirurgie, BG-Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Warener Str. 7, 12683, Berlin, Deutschland.
The wrist extends anatomically and functionally from the distal forearm to the metacarpal bones and encompasses the entire carpal region. The large number of bones and joints involved are stabilized in a highly complex system of extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, which enables a variety of different movements and stability in all positions for the best possible use of the hands. While injuries to individual ligaments or joints, most commonly the scapholunate (SL) ligament, can cause major problems the injuries associated with perilunate dislocations and dislocated fractures represent one of the greatest challenges in hand surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2025
Diagnostic Radiology, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan, PAK.
Introduction: Fractures are a common occurrence in childhood, with approximately one-third of boys and girls sustaining at least one fracture before the age of 17. Both-bone forearm fractures, particularly those involving the radius and ulna, are more common in the non-dominant hand and in boys and usually involve the distal portions of both bones. If not properly treated, these injuries can have a significant impact on limb function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthop Traumatol Surg Res
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Objective: The treatment of severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness is extremely complex. Complete open release of the elbow joint and reconstruction of stiffness-related injuries are considered crucial; however, these procedures may lead to elbow instability, particularly chronic instability due to underlying conditions. This retrospective study aimed to assess the outcomes of using an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) to ensure post-release stability in these complex cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnfallchirurgie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Breslauer Straße 201, 90471, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Forearm shaft fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity in young adults. By definition, these fractures are diaphyseal fractures; however, due to the complex functional unity formed by the forearm shaft during motion both bone forearm fractures are treated as intra-articular fractures [1, 3]. This is why the gold standard of treatment in adults is osteosynthesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUltrasound Med Biol
September 2025
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. Electronic address:
Objective: Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging overcomes the limitations of 2D ultrasound images by providing comprehensive spatial information. However, challenges remain when imaging larger body parts like legs and arms using traditional linear transducer arrays. The main difficulties include limited scanning range and angle, bone interference that affects penetration depth, and registration difficulties caused by squeezing targets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF