Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a rapidly developing technology broadly applied for the full-field characterization of tissue perfusion. Over the recent years, significant advancements have been made in interpreting LSCI measurements and improving the technique's accuracy. On the other hand, the method's precision has yet to be studied in detail, despite being as important as accuracy for many biomedical applications. Here we combine simulation, theory and animal experiments to systematically evaluate and re-analyze the role of key factors defining LSCI precision-speckle-to-pixel size ratio, polarisation, exposure time and camera-related noise. We show that contrary to the established assumptions, smaller speckle size and shorter exposure time can improve the precision, while the camera choice is less critical and does not affect the signal-to-noise ratio significantly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589309 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45303-z | DOI Listing |