A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Application of sample size re-estimation in clinical trials: A systematic review. | LitMetric

Application of sample size re-estimation in clinical trials: A systematic review.

Contemp Clin Trials Commun

Biostatistics Group, Biometrics Department, Development Unit, R&D Division, Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Otemachi Financial City Grand Cube, 1-9-2 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Published: December 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Sample size re-estimation (SSR) is a method used to recalculate sample size during clinical trial conduct to address a lack of adequate information and can have a significant impact on study size, duration, resources, and cost. Few studies to date have summarized the conditions and circumstances under which SSR is applied. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature related to SSR to better understand its application in clinical trial settings.

Methods: PubMed was used as the primary search source, supplemented with information from ClinicalTrials.gov where necessary details were lacking from PubMed. A systematic review was performed according to a pre-specified search strategy to identify clinical trials using SSR. Features of SSR, such as study phase and study start year, were summarized.

Results: In total, 253 publications met the pre-specified search criteria and 27 clinical trials were subsequently determined as relevant in SSR usage. Among trials where the study phase was provided, 2 (7.4%) trials were Phase I, 5 (18.5%) trials were Phase II, 11 (40.7%) trials were Phase III, and 2 (7.4%) trials were Phase IV.

Conclusion: Our results showed that SSR is also used in Phase I and II, which involve earlier decision making. We expect that SSR will continue to be used in early-phase trials where sufficient prior information may not be available. Furthermore, no major trends were observed in relation to therapy area or type of SSR, meaning that SSR may become a feasible and widely applied method in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568275PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101210DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trials phase
16
sample size
12
clinical trials
12
systematic review
12
ssr
10
trials
9
size re-estimation
8
clinical trial
8
pre-specified search
8
study phase
8

Similar Publications