Evaluating multi-cancer early detection tests: an argument for the outcome of recurrence-updated stage.

Br J Cancer

Scientist, Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Published: October 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The advent of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests has the potential to revolutionise the diagnosis of cancer, improving patient outcomes through early diagnosis and increased use of curative therapies. The ongoing NHS-Galleri trial is evaluating an MCED test developed by GRAIL, and is using as its primary endpoint the absolute incidence of late-stage cancer. Proponents of this outcome argue that if the test reduces the number of patients with advanced, incurable cancer, it can be reasonably assumed to be benefitting patients by reducing cancer mortality. Here, we argue that this assumption may not always hold due to the phenomenon of micro-metastatic disease, and propose an adjustment to the trial outcome so that it may better reflect the expected effect of the test on cancer mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575849PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02434-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multi-cancer early
8
early detection
8
cancer mortality
8
cancer
5
evaluating multi-cancer
4
detection tests
4
tests argument
4
argument outcome
4
outcome recurrence-updated
4
recurrence-updated stage
4

Similar Publications

Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCED) blood tests have the potential to screen for early-stage cancers. Understanding how people experience an MCED cancer signal result is vital prior to any future implementation. We explored experiences in a trial context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose/objectives: Cancer screening continues to be a major challenge, with reliable tests only being available for very few cancers. Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) genomic tests are being developed that allow for blood-based screening of multiple cancers simultaneously. The PATHFINDER study was a multi-institution prospective cohort study in healthy participants over the age of 50 years (no cancer history, or history of treated cancer > 3 years prior), investigating the feasibility of the Galleri (GRAIL, LLC) cfDNA methylation MCED blood test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

IntroductionThe ability to detect multiple cancer types with high sensitivity has the potential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve treatment outcomes. Diagnostic patterning tests (DPTs), which utilize self-organized patterns in drying body fluids, are a relatively unexplored diagnostic method. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed their accuracy for multi-cancer detection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are a novel approach to cancer screening, offering potential to detect multiple cancers through a single blood draw. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to buy-in of MCED tests and to develop a communication tool to support informed decision making.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using grounded theory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer remains a significant global health challenge, particularly for subpopulations with risk factors including genetic predisposition, comorbidities, and lifestyle, along with age. The Galleri® multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test is projected to be cost-effective for individuals aged ≥50 years. However, its potential value in subpopulations with elevated cancer risk remains underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF