Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
When using biodosimetry techniques to assess absorbed dose from an ionising radiation exposure, a calibration curve is required. At Health Canada (HC), these curves are generated for a variety of radiation qualities and assays to translate biological damage into absorbed dose. They are produced by irradiating biological samples in custom-designed water-equivalent phantoms inside a cabinet X-ray machine. In the HC lab, two different phantoms can be used for irradiation that differs in material composition and internal geometry. To ensure consistency, the impact of using the phantoms interchangeably was investigated. This was done through lab measurements and the development of a Monte Carlo (MC) model. Differences up to 6.7% were found between the two experimental setups, indicating the need for careful consideration if using these setups interchangeably in the laboratory. Once validated, the MC model can be used to investigate different aspects of the experimental setup without the need for laboratory measurements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788615 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncad166 | DOI Listing |