98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Considering the growing interest in matched cancer treatment, our aim was to evaluate the ability of a comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay to propose at least one targeted therapy given an identified genomic alteration or signature (actionability), and to collect the treatment modifications based on the CGP test results in clinical practise for solid tumors.
Methods: This retrospective, multicentre French study was conducted among 25 centres that participated in a free of charge program between 2017 and 2019 for a tissue CGP test. Data were collected on the patient, disease, tumor genomic profile, treatment suggested in the report (related to the genomic profile results) and subsequent therapeutic decisions according to the physician's declaration.
Results: Among the 416 patients, most had lung cancer (35.6%), followed by biliary tract cancer (11.5%) or rare cancers (11.1%); 75% had a metastatic disease. The actionability was 75.0% (95% CI [70.6%-78.9%]) for all patients, 85.1% and 78.4%, respectively in lung cancer and metastatic patients. After exclusion of clinical trial suggestions, the actionability decreased to 62.3% (95% CI [57.5%-66.8%]). Treatment modification based on the test results was observed in 17.3% of the patients and was more frequent in metastatic disease (OR = 2.73, 95% CI [1.31-5.71], p = 0.007). The main reasons for no treatment modification were poor general condition (33.2%) and stable disease or remission (30.2%). The genomic-directed treatment changes were performed mostly during the first six months after the CGP test, and interestingly a substantial part was observed from six to 24 months after the genomic profiling.
Conclusion: This French study provides information on the real-life actionability of a CGP test based on tissue samples, and trends to confirm its utility in clinical practice across the course of the disease, in particularly for patients with lung cancer and/or advanced disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501576 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291495 | PLOS |
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an interdisciplinary diabetes care team approach using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic outcomes in a population of adults with type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycemic control.
Research Design And Methods: This 6-month, longitudinal observational study was conducted at the outpatient endocrinology clinic of Carilion Clinic in Roanoke, VA. The intervention included use of CGM and weekly interactions either virtually or by telephone by one of the team members.
Cancer Med
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Introduction: Next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests are beneficial for refining diagnosis and personalized treatment of various cancers. However, the clinical impact of CGP, as covered by public health insurance in the management of sarcomas, remains unknown. Especially, the data on the utility of the newly emerging dual DNA-RNA panel compared to the conventional DNA-only panel in clinical settings is lacking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnticancer Res
August 2025
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan;
Background/aim: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with tissue- and blood-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is integral to the delivery of personalized medicine for targeted cancer therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the variant concordance for somatic variants using two clinical NGS systems for conducting both tissue- and blood-based analyses: Genexus-OCA v3 (OCA) FoundationOne CDx (F1) for tissues and Genexus OPA (OPA) FoundationOne CDx Liquid (F1L) for blood.
Patients And Methods: The concordance of genomic alterations between the two NGS analyses was compared in six patients with breast, head, and neck cancers using tissue and circulating tumor DNA biopsies.
Cancer Med
August 2025
Dermatology Research Centre, The Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Background And Aim: Historical genetic sequencing of specific cancer variants has been superseded by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). This narrative review aimed to capture current international evidence on the clinical utility of CGP for cancer prevention, detection and treatment.
Materials And Methods: A literature search of three databases was performed to identify key studies on the frequency of germline and somatic variants in adult cancers and the extent to which they inform diagnosis, management and outcome.
Sci Rep
July 2025
OC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
A large proportion of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbor clinically actionable genomic alterations, detected in general by broad Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels, since it is the gold standard test and strongly recommended by different societies. However, high failure rates due to preanalytical factors and long turnaround times are still hindering rapid treatment decision taking in the real-world setting. The objective of this study was to validate the IntelliPlex Lung Cancer Panel by πCODE Technology for biomarker detection using clinical specimens compared to NGS as the gold standard methodology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF