98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Accurate operative notes are imperative to patient care and are used for communication, billing, quality assurance, and medical-legal conflicts. However, operative note quality often varies and many lack critical details. Unfortunately, no standardized training exists in operative dictations for surgical trainees. This pilot study sought to determine resident ability to dictate a comprehensive operative note and to determine a need for a formal operative dictation curriculum.
Methods: Thirty-eight surgical residents between post-graduate years (PGY) one to four participated in a ventral hernia repair simulation. One senior (PGY3/4) resident coached two junior residents (PGY1/2). Residents completed an informal needs assessment regarding operative dictations. Post-simulation, residents completed an operative dictation. Notes were graded using a modified validated rubric.
Results: Thirty-five residents completed the needs assessment, and 38 residents submitted an operative note. Eighty-two percent of this group have completed ≤ 25 operative dictations in training and 77% have received minimal feedback on operative dictations. Out of 33 total points, mean overall score was 18.9 ± 5.4 (Junior resident: 17.9 ± 5.4; Senior resident: 20.9 ± 4.8) Total mean scores did not significantly differ between junior and senior residents (p = 0.10). Senior and junior residents scored similarly on the procedural details component (p = 0.29). Senior residents scored higher on relevant patient history and operative note headers (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: Standard surgical training may not provide enough teaching and feedback to residents on operative note dictations. A formal residency training curriculum may bolster trainee ability to learn the components of an effective operative note.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10404-3 | DOI Listing |
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Med+X Center for Informatics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Cureus
August 2025
Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, GBR.
Introduction Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely regarded as the standard of care after the resection of brain metastases in order to reduce local cavity recurrence risk. The objective of this study was to explore the reproducibility of published outcomes for patients receiving post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (cavity SRS) in a National Health Service (NHS) setting for a non-selective series of patients. For our service, the median interval between surgery to cavity SRS (cSRS) is eight weeks, whereas similar timelines have been found to have a deleterious impact on survival in the published literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2025
Spinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.
For lumbar spinal canal stenosis, endoscopic spine surgery typically employs a unilateral approach. While this approach has the advantage of early access to the lamina, it risks damage to the facet joint on the entry side. Additionally, decompression of the ipsilateral lateral recess can be challenging, sometimes resulting in inadequate decompression laterally, leading to incomplete symptom relief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Pediatr
September 2025
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Hospital for Children, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Unlabelled: Drooling is a common problem in children with neurodisability, and refractory cases may require surgery. Our aim was to assess whether a child's response to salivary botulinum toxin injections would predict success or failure from subsequent surgical intervention. Retrospective case note review of all children undergoing drooling surgery between 1st January 2007 and 31st December 2023 at the Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Transl Sci
September 2025
Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Since the first decentralized clinical trial (DCT) was conducted in 2011, there has been an increased usage of DCT due to its benefits of patient-centricity and generalizability of findings. This trend was further expedited by the global COVID-19 pandemic. We identified 23 case studies across various therapeutic areas and grouped them into different categories according to their purposes-by necessity, for operational benefits, to address unique research questions, to validate innovative digital endpoints, or to validate decentralization as a clinical research platform.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF