Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the ideal length of anticoagulation therapy for cancer patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), comparing 12 months versus 3 months of edoxaban treatment, considering the balance between preventing thrombotic events and the risk of bleeding.
  • A multicenter clinical trial included 601 patients, showing that longer treatment (12 months) significantly reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related deaths compared to 3 months (1% vs. 7.2%).
  • However, the incidence of major bleeding was slightly higher in the 12-month group (9.5%) versus the 3-month group (7.2%), indicating that while longer treatment is

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding.

Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point.

Results: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point.

Conclusions: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066360DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

edoxaban group
24
deep vein
20
vein thrombosis
20
3-month edoxaban
20
patients cancer
16
isolated distal
16
distal deep
16
edoxaban treatment
16
12-month edoxaban
16
patients
15

Similar Publications

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in cancer patients, and a substantial number of patients are being treated with oral anticoagulants. We aim to assess the comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin for VTE treatment in cancer patients.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 2,367 cancer patients who are new users of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for VTE treatment from 2009 to 2021 in NHS Scotland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) have a lower stroke risk than those with ECG-diagnosed AF, requiring careful evaluation of oral anticoagulation benefits vs. its inherent bleeding risk.

Methods And Results: An unmatched win ratio analysis was performed of the NOAH-AFNET 6 trial dataset, using components of the primary efficacy and safety outcomes of the trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

(1) Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and poses a clinical dilemma in the very elderly due to increased thromboembolic and bleeding risks. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes-including thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality-by age group in elderly East Asian patients with non-valvular AF receiving oral anticoagulants. (2) Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 502 patients aged ≥70 years treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or apixaban) or warfarin between 2016 and 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) increase the risk of bleeding during invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy. To mitigate this risk, NOACs are typically held before bronchoscopy. Current guidelines for discontinuing NOACs are based on drug half-lives and recommendations from similar invasive procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Systemic anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) medications are commonly prescribed for various conditions. We assess complication rates after injection laryngoplasty (IL) and medialization thyroplasty (MT) in patients taking AC/AP perioperatively.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX United States Collaborative Network database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF