98%
921
2 minutes
20
Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort analysis.
Objectives: This study evaluates utilization and demographic trends for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusions across the United States (US).
Methods: Patients who underwent SIJ fusion from 2010-2021 were identified within the PearlDiver national database using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9, ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Indications for trauma, malignancy, or infection were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedure characteristics were recorded along with annual utilization rates. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated to identify increasing or decreasing utilization from prior years. Negative binomial regression was performed to project subsequent utilization for 2022-2028. Chi-squared analysis followed by post-hoc comparisons were used to compare differences in diagnostic indications and clinical features associated with SIJ fusion across regions. Bonferroni adjustments were applied to -values for pairwise analyses.
Results: Overall, 18 032 patients (69.8% female, mean age = 51.0 13.4 years) underwent SIJ fusion between 2010 and 2021. Annual utilization increased by 33.5% on average. The South comprised the largest proportion of cases (48.9%). Projections for 2022-2028 predict continued growth in procedures, with an overall increase of 1100% from 1350 cases in 2021 to 16 195 by end of 2028. Spondyloarthropathy-induced sacroilitis was the most prevalent diagnostic indication nationwide (51%). Of patients undergoing SIJ fusion, 18% had a prior lumbar fusion, and only 45% received a preoperative diagnostic SIJ injection.
Conclusion: As SIJ fusion is increasingly utilized to treat refractory SIJ-based pain, establishing evidence-based guidelines, improving diagnostic strategies, and defining indications are imperative to support growing applications within clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877661 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682231196448 | DOI Listing |
Neurochirurgie
September 2025
CHU Lille, Neurochirurgie, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ Lille, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL - Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille, INRIA, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Lille, France; AO Spine, Chairman for France, 7270 Davos, Switzerland; Head of Innovation Commission for the French Soc
Background: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) accounts for 15-25% of chronic low back pain and often follows lumbar fusion. When conservative therapies fail, minimally invasive (MIS) SIJ fusion (SIJF) is indicated. The robot-assisted technique is feasible and safe, enhancing accuracy and reducing radiation exposure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Med Case Rep
August 2025
Department of Pain Management, University Hospital, Cleveland, OH.
Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a prevalent cause of chronic low back pain (LBP), affecting many adults in the United States. The SIJ provides stability and proper weight distribution from the trunk. Degenerative disruption to this joint can result in shearing and tension that can lead to significant pain and force imbalances.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2025
Anesthesiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a significant contributor to lower back pain, and the condition often mimics other lower back pain syndromes, necessitating accurate diagnosis through history, physical examination, provocative tests, and imaging studies. We present a 67-year-old man with a history of sarcoidosis, deep vein thrombosis, prostate cancer, and chronic low back pain, who experienced persistent right-sided back and hip pain despite multiple surgeries, including bilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion. Conservative treatments provided only partial relief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Pract
September 2025
The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
Introduction: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant contributor to chronic low back pain. Between 70% and 85% of people will suffer from low back pain (LBP) at some stage in their lives, and 15%-30% of these individuals will experience pain associated with the SIJ. With the limitations of conservative treatments in addressing the underlying pain and dysfunction, minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has emerged as a promising intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Rev Med Devices
August 2025
Department of Pain Management, Restorative Pain Institute, Louisville, KY, USA.
Background: Scientific evidence on novel transarticular inferior-posterior surgical approaches for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, designed to minimize the risk of neurovascular injury, remains limited.
Methods: This prospective, multi-center study evaluated disability (ODI), SI-joint pain (VAS), and patient satisfaction following SI joint fusion using the inferior-posterior approach. The primary endpoint was composite success, defined as: (1) ≥20 mm VAS pain reduction, (2) no device-related serious adverse events, (3) no neurological worsening, and (4) no surgical reintervention.