Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Predatory journals and conferences are an emerging problem in scientific literature as they have financial motives, without guaranteeing scientific quality and exposure. The main objective of the ASGLOS project is to investigate the predatory e-email characteristics, management, and possible consequences and to analyse the extent of the current problem at each academic level. To collect the personal experiences of physicians' mailboxes on predatory publishing, a Google Form® survey was designed and disseminated from September 2021 to April 2022. A total of 978 responses were analysed from 58 countries around the world. A total of 64.8% of participants indicated the need for 3 or fewer emails to acquire a criticality view in distinguishing a real invitation from a spam, while 11.5% still have doubt regardless of how many emails they get. The AGLOS Study clearly highlights the problem of academic e-mail spam by predatory journals and conferences. Our findings signify the importance of providing academic career-oriented advice and organising training sessions to increase awareness of predatory publishing for those conducting scientific research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12421DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

predatory journals
12
journals conferences
8
problem academic
8
predatory publishing
8
predatory
6
asglos study
4
study global
4
global survey
4
survey predatory
4
journals affect
4

Similar Publications

Background: Research quality in Ayush systems of medicine is vital for evidence synthesis and decision-making. As Ayush gains global recognition, analyzing its trends and challenges is important for improving clinical outcomes. However, a comprehensive analysis of research publications is lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hijacked medical journals rank first via search engine optimization and threaten academic integrity.

Eur J Intern Med

August 2025

Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Kecskemét, Hungary; Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Gödöllő, Hungary

The rise of questionable journals poses a significant threat to academic integrity, resulting in substantial waste of institutional and university resources. This commentary analysis focuses on six hijacked medical journals, a specific type of questionable publication. We utilized Semrush, an online Search Engine Optimization auditing platform, to analyse our data, which revealed that hijacked journals disseminate their content through search engines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Traditional peer review (TPR), despite being touted as the bedrock by which scientific knowledge is screened, vetted, and validated, is riddled with biases, limitations, and abuses, reducing not only trust in this publishing model, but overall in the scientific record that claims to be peer-reviewed. Two models that were proposed to fortify the TPR model, open peer review (OPR) and preprints, have themselves shown biases, limitations, and risks of abuse. OPR journals that claim to be peer reviewed should only be rewarded-in terms of indexing and metrics-when they can prove that they have conducted peer review-i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Questionable publication practices and predatory journals pose an increasing challenge to scientific integrity. These publication models advertise rapid publication times but lack essential quality controls such as peer-review processes, transparency, and charge high fees, which facilitates the dissemination of unreliable research findings. There is an increased risk, particularly for less experienced researchers, of unknowingly publishing in such journals or using their content uncritically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF