98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Treatment of patients diagnosed with angina due to epicardial or microvascular coronary artery spasm (CAS) is challenging because patients often remain symptomatic despite conventional pharmacological therapy. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cross-over proof-of-concept study, we compared the efficacy and safety of macitentan, a potent inhibitor of the endothelin-1 receptor, to placebo in symptomatic patients with CAS despite background pharmacological treatment.
Methods: Patients with CAS diagnosed by invasive spasm provocation testing with >3 anginal attacks per week despite pharmacological treatment were considered for participation. Participants received either 10 mg of macitentan or placebo daily for 28 days as add-on treatment. After a wash-out period patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment arm. The primary endpoint was the difference in anginal burden calculated as [1] the duration (in minutes) * severity (on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale 1-10); and [2] the frequency of angina attacks * severity during medication use compared to the run-in phase.
Results: 28 patients of whom 22 females (79%) and a mean age of 55.3 ± 7.6 completed the entire study protocol (epicardial CAS n = 19 (68), microvascular CAS n = 9 (32)). Change in both indices of anginal burden were not different during treatment with add-on macitentan as compared to add-on placebo (duration*severity: -9 [-134 78] vs -45 [-353 11], p = 0.136 and frequency*severity: -1.7 [-5.8 1.2] vs -1.8 [-6.2 0.3], p = 0.767). The occurrence and nature of self-reported adverse events were closely similar between the treatment phase with macitentan and placebo.
Conclusion: In patients with angina due to epicardial or microvascular CAS despite background pharmacological treatment, 28 days of add-on treatment with the ET-1 receptor antagonist, macitentan 10 mg daily, did not reduce anginal burden compared to add-on treatment with placebo.Trial Registrationhttps://trialsearch.who.int/, Identifier: EUCTR2018-002623-42-NL. Registration date: 20 February 2019.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422675 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101238 | DOI Listing |
Eur Heart J Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, 4-6-1, Noisshiki, Gifu 500-8717, Japan.
J Electrocardiol
August 2025
Department of Cardiology, Kırşehir Ahi Evran Training and Research Hospital, Kırşehir, Turkey. Electronic address:
Background: Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, often related to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Identifying non-invasive electrocardiographic markers that predict ischemia in this population remains a clinical priority. P-wave peak time (PWPT), reflecting atrial conduction delay, has been linked to ischemic pathophysiology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Heart Assoc
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, China; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Ischemic Heart Diseases; Key Laboratory of Viral Heart Diseases Chinese A
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could restore epicardial blood flow through the stent-based angioplasty. However, coronary microcirculatory function also impacts clinical outcomes and can be quantified by the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR). The prognostic significance of periprocedural angio-IMR in patients undergoing elective PCI remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Opin Cardiol
August 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine.
Purpose Of Review: This paper reviews the current understanding of coronary vascular dysfunction (CVDys) in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), based on recent findings from a comprehensive, large-scale study. It also discusses potential future directions for research and clinical practice.
Recent Findings: CVDys involves enhanced vasoconstriction or impaired vasodilation caused by endothelium-dependent and/or -independent dysfunction in the epicardial or microvascular coronary arteries.
EuroIntervention
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background: Ischaemia without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) is common and is often related to coronary microvascular disease (CMD). Previous studies primarily focused on functional assessment in patients with established ischaemia without obstructive epicardial CAD.
Aims: We sought to assess the prevalence of CMD and compare clinical and procedural characteristics including myocardial perfusion imaging, as derived from rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (Rb-PET), and health status according to CAD classification.