A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Single-port multiport robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experiences by case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The da Vinci single-port (SP) system has been used in various surgical fields, including colorectal surgery. However, limited experience has been reported on its safety and feasibility. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SP robotic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer compared with multiport (MP) robotic surgery.

Methods: Rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection in 2020 were reviewed. A total of 43 patients underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (TME), of which 26 (13 in each group, SP MP) were included in the case-matched cohort for analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Median tumor height was similar between the 2 groups (SP MP: 5.9 cm [range, 2.2-9.6 cm] 6.7 cm [range, 3.4-10.0 cm], P = 0.578). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy was equally performed (38.5%). The median estimated blood loss was less (20.0 mL [range, 5.0-20.0 mL] 30.0 mL [range, 20.0-30.0 mL], P = 0.020) and the median hospital stay was shorter (7 days [range, 6-8 days] 8 days [range, 7-9 days], P = 0.055) in the SP group. Postoperative complications did not differ (SP MP: 7.7% 23.1%, P = 0.587). One patient in the SP group and 3 in the MP group experienced anastomotic leakage.

Conclusion: SP robotic TME showed perioperative outcomes similar to MP robotic TME. The SP robotic system can be considered a surgical option for the treatment of rectal cancer. Further prospective randomized trials with larger cohorts are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409629PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.2.99DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
multiport robotic
8
robotic total
8
total mesorectal
8
mesorectal excision
8
short-term outcomes
8
outcomes robotic
8
treatment rectal
8
patients underwent
8
days [range
8

Similar Publications