Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vessel hyperintensity(FVH)refers to the hyperintensity corresponding to the arteries in the subarachnoid space. It is caused by critically slowed blood flow and is commonly encountered in patients with large artery steno-occlusions. Quite a few studies have focused on the clinical significance of FLAIR vessel hyperintensity in terms of its relationship to the prognosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA), baseline severity or infarction volume, early neurological deterioration or infarction growth, and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, inconsistent or conflicting findings were common in these studies and caused confusion in the clinical decision-making process guided by this imaging marker. Through reviewing the available studies on the etiologic mechanism of FVH and investigating findings on its clinical significance in AIS and TIA, this review aims to elucidate the key factors for interpreting the clinical significance of FVH individually.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111010 | DOI Listing |