A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Prevalence of Optical Coherence Tomography Artifacts in High Myopia and its Influence on Glaucoma Diagnosis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Prcis: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) artifacts occur much more frequently in highly myopic eyes compared with non-highly myopic eyes. A longer axial length is predictive of having OCT artifacts.

Purpose: To investigate the types and prevalence of artifacts on OCT scans in patients with and without high myopia.

Materials And Methods: Patients were divided into 4 groups based on whether they had glaucoma and/or high myopia. All peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scan images were individually inspected for the presence of artifacts.

Results: Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled. The prevalence of OCT artifacts was 18.6% in non-high myopes and 51.9% in high myopes ( P <0.001). Outer RNFL border misidentification was the most common type of artifact for non-high myopes, whereas retinal pathology-related artifact was the most common in high myopes. Univariable regression analysis showed that a longer axial length [odds ratio (OR) 1.815, P <0.001], a higher pattern standard deviation (OR 1.194, P <0.001), and thinner RNFL (OR 0.947, P <0.001) were predictive factors for the presence of OCT artifacts. The diagnostic capability of global RNFL thickness before and after manual correction of segmentation errors did not differ for both non-high myopes [area under the receiver operating curve 0.915-0.913 ( P =0.955)] and high myopes [area under the receiver operating curve 0.906-0.917 ( P =0.806)].

Conclusion: The prevalence of OCT artifacts was the highest in patients with both high myopia and glaucoma. The most common type of OCT artifact is different for non-high myopes and high myopes. Physicians need to be aware of a higher likelihood of OCT artifacts, particularly in those with a longer axial length, worse visual field, and thinner RNFL thickness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453355PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002268DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optical coherence
8
coherence tomography
8
high myopia
8
oct artifacts
8
myopic eyes
8
prevalence optical
4
artifacts
4
tomography artifacts
4
high
4
artifacts high
4

Similar Publications