98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: While colorectal polyps are not cancerous, some types of polyps, known as adenomas, can develop into colorectal cancer over time. Polyps can often be found and removed by colonoscopy; however, this is an invasive and expensive test. Thus, there is a need for new methods of screening patients at high risk of developing polyps.
Aim: To identify a potential association between colorectal polyps and small intestine bacteria overgrowth (SIBO) or other relevant factors in a patient cohort with lactulose breath test (LBT) results.
Methods: A total of 382 patients who had received an LBT were classified into polyp and non-polyp groups that were confirmed by colonoscopy and pathology. SIBO was diagnosed by measuring LBT-derived hydrogen (H) and methane (M) levels according to 2017 North American Consensus recommendations. Logistic regression was used to assess the ability of LBT to predict colorectal polyps. Intestinal barrier function damage (IBFD) was determined by blood assays.
Results: H and M levels revealed that the prevalence of SIBO was significantly higher in the polyp group than in the non-polyp group (41% 23%, < 0.01; 71% 59%, < 0.05, respectively). Within 90 min of lactulose ingestion, the peak H values in the adenomatous and inflammatory/hyperplastic polyp patients were significantly higher than those in the non-polyp group ( < 0.01, and = 0.03, respectively). In 227 patients with SIBO defined by combining H and M values, the rate of IBFD determined by blood lipopolysaccharide levels was significantly higher among patients with polyps than those without (15% 5%, < 0.05). In regression analysis with age and gender adjustment, colorectal polyps were most accurately predicted with models using M peak values or combined H and M values limited by North American Consensus recommendations for SIBO. These models had a sensitivity of ≥ 0.67, a specificity of ≥ 0.64, and an accuracy of ≥ 0.66.
Conclusion: The current study made key associations among colorectal polyps, SIBO, and IBFD and demonstrated that LBT has moderate potential as an alternative noninvasive screening tool for colorectal polyps.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315122 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1138 | DOI Listing |
Khirurgiia (Mosk)
September 2025
National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Objective: To study the results of treatment of cancer in tubular villous adenomas.
Material And Methods: A retrospective analysis included 51 patients with cTis-T1N0M0 between 02.2019 and 09.
Medicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
To observe the specific changes of auricular points in patients with colorectal polyps (CPs) by auricular assessment. To summarize the clusters of auricular point-specific changes in patients with CPs, and to inform further research into auricular point assisted diagnosis of CPs. A total of 300 participants, with 150 having CPs and 150 having no CPs, were recruited for this case-control study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Digestive Medicine Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, People's Republic of China.
Background: Laparoscopic segmental resection (LSR) is a common treatment modality for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has emerged as a promising alternative, yet current evidence of its efficacy remains limited.
Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to compare the therapeutic outcomes of LECS versus LSR for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps and to provide robust evidence for clinical practice.
Gastro Hep Adv
July 2025
Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Background And Aims: Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening modality for colorectal cancer; however, it is operator-dependent and reliant on exam quality. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection and clinical outcomes, but this is a sociotechnical challenge that requires effective human-AI teaming incorporating provider attitudes.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating attitudes and perspectives of providers toward AI-assisted colonoscopy.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
October 2025
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Background: Guidelines recommend leaving in situ rectosigmoid polyps diagnosed during colonoscopy that are 5 mm or smaller if the endoscopist optically predicts them to be non-neoplastic. However, no randomised controlled trial has been done to examine the efficacy and safety of this strategy.
Methods: This open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial enrolled adults age 18 years or older undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or clinical indications across four Italian centres.