98%
921
2 minutes
20
The main objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between selected sociodemographic factors (i.e. sexual orientation, gender and AIDS status), and the level of HIV/AIDS stigma among people living with HIV (PLWH). The participants were 663 adults with a medically confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection, undergoing antiretroviral treatment. Their level of HIV/AIDS stigma was assessed with the Berger HIV Stigma Scale, and relevant sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained using a self-report survey. The main effect was revealed only for sexual orientation and total stigma; those with heterosexual orientation declared higher levels of total stigma than those with other sexual orientations. For the subscales, significant results were obtained only for disclosure concerns. Namely, for the interaction of gender and sexual orientation, the highest level of disclosure stigma was declared by heterosexual women, while there was no such relationship for men. This result was further modified when AIDS diagnosis was added to the interaction. There is a cumulative effect of PLWH minority statuses, rather than main effects of each status individually. Thus, each minority status should be analysed from at least two perspectives, general (i.e., compared to the general population) and relative (i.e., compared to the population in question).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318048 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37948-7 | DOI Listing |
PLOS Glob Public Health
September 2025
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Youth living with perinatally acquired HIV (APHIV) in India face layered challenges; peer-led differentiated care models show promise but remain underexplored. We examined multi-stakeholder perceptions within the I'mPossible Fellowship, a peer-support DSD intervention addressing APHIV health, education, and livelihoods From May-December 2023, we enrolled three stakeholder groups: (1) intervention deliverers (APHIV "fellows" 18-27 yrs), (2) facilitators ("supervisors" of APHIV), and (3) recipients(APHIV "peers" in care, 8-26 yrs). We conducted interviews with 8 fellows (75% female, mean age 22.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Int AIDS Soc
September 2025
Technical Advisor HIV Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Introduction: Key populations (KP), including men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, sex workers, transgender people and people in closed settings, are disproportionately affected by HIV and face structural and legal barriers to care. While community-led responses are central to reaching KP, services are often disease-specific and disconnected from national primary healthcare (PHC) systems. PHC, defined by WHO as a whole-of-society approach to delivering integrated and person-centred services, is rarely designed to meet the broader health needs of KP, who also experience high burdens of non-communicable diseases, mental health conditions and violence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian J Public Health
September 2025
Former Director General of Health Services, MOHFW, Government of India, Delhi, India.
Background: The hijra and transgender (H/TG) persons have enhanced risk of HIV infection.
Objectives: We aimed to explore whether there were any associations between stigma, HIV risk behaviors, and HIV seropositivity among H/TG persons in India.
Materials And Methods: We analyzed 4966 H/TG participants, from the national integrated biological and behavioral surveillance survey conducted in 2014-2015 focusing on experiences of stigma from family, friends, and healthcare settings.
BMC Glob Public Health
September 2025
School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Background: Many university students have poor mental health, and sexual minority students may be particularly vulnerable. This study explored lived experiences and drivers of poor mental health amongst lesbian and bisexual students in a South African university.
Methods: Three focus-group discussions were conducted in isiZulu on three campuses, with 56 participants between 18 and 30 years old, identified through the campus LGBTQI + forum.