Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The Pediatric Heart Network's Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) Trial (Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., NCT02741115) demonstrated improvements in some measures of exercise capacity and in the myocardial performance index following 6 months of treatment with udenafil (87.5 mg twice daily). In this post hoc analysis, we evaluate whether subgroups within the population experienced a differential effect on exercise performance in response to treatment. The effect of udenafil on exercise was evaluated within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including peak oxygen consumption (VO), serum brain-type natriuretic peptide level, weight, race, gender, and ventricular morphology. Differences among subgroups were evaluated using ANCOVA modeling with fixed factors for treatment arm and subgroup and the interaction between treatment arm and subgroup. Within-subgroup analyses demonstrated trends toward quantitative improvements in peak VO, work rate at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), VO at VAT, and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO) for those randomized to udenafil compared to placebo in nearly all subgroups. There was no identified differential response to udenafil based on baseline peak VO, baseline BNP level, weight, race and ethnicity, gender, or ventricular morphology, although participants in the lowest tertile of baseline peak VO trended toward larger improvements. The absence of a differential response across subgroups in response to treatment with udenafil suggests that the treatment benefit may not be restricted to specific sub-populations. Further work is warranted to confirm the potential benefit of udenafil and to evaluate the long-term tolerability and safety of treatment and to determine the impact of udenafil on the development of other morbidities related to the Fontan circulation.Trial Registration NCT0274115.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03204-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

udenafil exercise
12
treatment udenafil
12
fontan udenafil
8
exercise longitudinal
8
udenafil
8
response treatment
8
level weight
8
weight race
8
gender ventricular
8
ventricular morphology
8

Similar Publications

Background: In structurally normal hearts, increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with larger ventricular mass and volume, however, this association has yet to be described in adult Fontan patients.

Objectives: This study evaluates the relationship of increased BMI and ventricular characteristics by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a multi-institutional adult Fontan population.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study using the Fontan Outcomes Registry using CMR Examinations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In the FUEL (Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal) trial, a positive treatment effect was identified for outcomes at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold but not for the primary outcome, oxygen consumption (Vo) at peak exercise. This disparate response may be explained by the physiologic challenge of improving peak Vo in participants with near-normal baseline exercise performance.

Methods: Participants were divided into subgroups by baseline predicted peak Vo (<80% versus ≥80%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To explore the differences in exercise capacity between the extracardiac conduit (ECC) and lateral tunnel (LT) Fontan. 2169 patients (36% LT ( = 774); 64% ECC ( = 1395)) underwent a Fontan operation between 2000 to 2023 in a multi-institutional Fontan registry. LT patients were age-matched to ECC patients, and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) results were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Adolescent and parental perceptions of the Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal Assessment Randomised Controlled Trial (FUEL) and its open-label extension were examined, to identify factors affecting future research participation.

Methods: A validated survey was administered at two time points to adolescents (12-19 years) and their parents to assess likes/dislikes of study participation, research team, study burden and benefits. A 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree [-2] to strongly agree [ + 2]) was used, and scores were averaged.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF