A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Interplay between and during In Vitro Infection of a Chicken Macrophage Cell Line (HD11). | LitMetric

Interplay between and during In Vitro Infection of a Chicken Macrophage Cell Line (HD11).

Life (Basel)

Institute of Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 35, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Published: May 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: is a frequent intestinal pathogen of chickens, causing economic impact on the poultry industry. is a neglected parasite in chickens. However, because of its zoonotic potential, poultry cryptosporidiosis may pose a risk to public health. Little is known about the parasite-host interactions during coinfection with both parasites. In this study, we investigated the possible interactions during in vitro coinfection of and in a chicken macrophage cell line (HD11).

Methods: HD11 cells were inoculated with and sporozoites and incubated 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post infection (hpi). Mono-infections for each parasite were also investigated. Real-time PCR was used to quantify parasite replication. Additionally, macrophage mRNA expression levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, iNOS, and IL-10 were measured.

Results: For both parasites, multiplication was, in most groups, lower in the coinfection group (COIG) compared with mono-infections. However, at 6 hpi, the number of copies was higher in co-infections. Intracellular replication started to decrease from 12 hpi onward, and it was almost undetectable by 48 hpi in all groups. Infections resulted in low expression of all cytokines, except at 48 hpi.

Conclusions: Infection of avian macrophages with both and seemed to hinder intracellular replication for both parasites in comparison to mono-infection. A clear reduction in intracellular parasites from 12 hpi onward details the important role potentially played by macrophages in host control of these parasites.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301476PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13061267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chicken macrophage
8
macrophage cell
8
intracellular replication
8
hpi onward
8
parasites
5
hpi
5
interplay vitro
4
vitro infection
4
infection chicken
4
cell hd11
4

Similar Publications