98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To test whether the impact of subjective norms, race/ethnicity-specific descriptive norms, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, and prosocial concern on COVID-19 vaccination intentions differs by race/ethnicity for young adults.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: May-August 2021 in Texas.
Subjects: Racially/ethnically diverse unvaccinated college students (N = 314).
Measures: COVID-19 vaccination intentions, theory-driven constructs (eg, perceived susceptibility), vaccine conspiracy beliefs, prosocial concern, and social norms.
Analysis: Block-sequential multiple Tobit regression.
Results: Results revealed three significant two-way interactions between race/ethnicity and (1) subjective norms, (5, 251) = 2.28, < .05; (2) COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs, (5, 251) = 2.88, < .05; and (3) prosocial concern, (5, 251) = 2.61, < .05. There was a positive association between subjective norms and intentions for European and African Americans, a positive association between prosocial concerns and intentions for European and multiracial/multiethnic Americans, and a negative association between conspiracy beliefs and intention for Hispanics. The interaction between race/ethnicity and race/ethnicity-specific descriptive norms was not significant, (5, 251) = 1.09, = .37.
Conclusion: Although based on a relatively small sample, our findings suggest the importance of culturally tailoring COVID-19 vaccination messages to correct conspiracy beliefs, signaling a positive subjective norm, and enhancing prosocial concerns for specific racial-ethnic groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300626 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08901171231186315 | DOI Listing |
Br J Psychol
September 2025
Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center of Cognition and Communication, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
In this pre-registered experiment conducted in the Netherlands and Türkiye (N = 550), we investigated how the source of advice (peer vs. expert) influences people's decision-making when assessing the carbon footprint of a flight between two cities. We also examined whether this effect was influenced by their conspiracy mentality, collective narcissism, epistemic individualism, and climate change scepticism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Psychol
September 2025
School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Prebunking can be used to pre-emptively refute conspiracy narratives. We developed a new approach to prebunking - fighting fire with fire - which introduces a plausible 'meta-conspiracy' suggesting that conspiracy theories are deliberately spread as part of a wider conspiracy. In two preregistered intervention studies, prebunking specific COVID-19 vaccine (Study 1, N = 720) and climate change (Study 2, N = 1077) conspiracy theories (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychol Rep
September 2025
Department of Political Science, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled numerous conspiracy theories that have reinvigorated prejudices and stereotypes toward marginalized groups. While much current research focuses on the correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, the consequences of conspiracy narratives for outgroup attitudes are rarely examined. Across two studies, we investigate the relationship between COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and attitudes toward ethnic minorities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPublic Underst Sci
September 2025
Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, France.
Substantial minorities of the population report a low degree of trust in science, or endorse conspiracy theories that violate basic scientific knowledge. This might indicate a wholesale rejection of science. In four studies, we asked 782 US participants questions about trust in science, conspiracy beliefs, and basic science (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Opin Psychol
December 2025
University of Hohenheim, Department of Sustainable Behavior and Management, Wollgrasweg 49, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address:
The idea that conspiracy believers are prone to willful ignorance is widespread, yet many seemingly supporting studies lack designs suited to test this claim. Emerging research that actually examines willful ignorance along the information processing stream provides a more nuanced and optimistic picture. While there is initial (though limited) evidence that conspiracy believers are less likely to engage with facts in the first place, there is only little support for willful ignorance upon confrontation with such information.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF