A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Multiomic Analysis Identifies a High-Risk Metabolic and TME Depleted Signature that Predicts Early Clinical Failure in DLBCL. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: 60-70% of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients avoid events within 24 months of diagnosis (EFS24) and the remainder have poor outcomes. Recent genetic and molecular classification of DLBCL has advanced our knowledge of disease biology, yet were not designed to predict early events and guide anticipatory selection of novel therapies. To address this unmet need, we used an integrative multiomic approach to identify a signature at diagnosis that will identify DLBCL at high risk of early clinical failure.

Patients And Methods: Tumor biopsies from 444 newly diagnosed DLBCL were analyzed by WES and RNAseq. A combination of weighted gene correlation network analysis and differential gene expression analysis followed by integration with clinical and genomic data was used to identify a multiomic signature associated with high risk of early clinical failure.

Results: Current DLBCL classifiers are unable to discriminate cases who fail EFS24. We identified a high risk RNA signature that had a hazard ratio (HR, 18.46 [95% CI 6.51-52.31] < .001) in a univariate model, which did not attenuate after adjustment for age, IPI and COO (HR, 20.8 [95% CI, 7.14-61.09] < .001). Further analysis revealed the signature was associated with metabolic reprogramming and a depleted immune microenvironment. Finally, WES data was integrated into the signature and we found that inclusion of mutations resulted in identification of 45% of cases with an early clinical failure which was validated in external DLBCL cohorts.

Conclusion: This novel and integrative approach is the first to identify a signature at diagnosis that will identify DLBCL at high risk for early clinical failure and may have significant implications for design of therapeutic options.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10274962PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.07.23290748DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early clinical
20
high risk
16
clinical failure
12
risk early
12
dlbcl
8
newly diagnosed
8
approach identify
8
identify signature
8
signature diagnosis
8
diagnosis will
8

Similar Publications