A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Utility of Intestinal Ultrasound in Clinical Decision-Making for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. | LitMetric

Utility of Intestinal Ultrasound in Clinical Decision-Making for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Crohns Colitis 360

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Lynda K and David M Underwood Center for Digestive Disorders, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.

Published: July 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: There is a clinical need to improve the monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. Despite being used regularly in European countries, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has been implemented less in the United States for unclear reasons.

Aims: The aim of this study is to illustrate how IUS can be used as a clinical decision-making tool in an American IBD cohort.

Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated patients with IBD seen at our institution who underwent IUS as part of routine evaluation of their IBD from July 2020 to March 2022. To evaluate the clinical utility of IUS for different patient populations and against more frequently used measures of inflammation, we compared patient demographics, inflammatory markers, clinical scores, and medications between patients in remission and those with active inflammation. Treatment plans between the 2 groups were compared and we analyzed patients with follow-up IUS visits to validate treatment plan decisions at initial evaluation.

Results: Out of 148 total patients with IUS, we found that 62.1% ( = 92) of our patients had active disease and 37.9% ( = 56) were in remission. Ulcerative colitis activity index and Mayo scores were both significantly correlated with IUS findings. The treatment plan was significantly correlated with IUS findings ( = .004). At follow-up, we observed an overall decrease in intestinal thickening, improvements in vascular flow, and mural stratification.

Conclusions: Clinical decisions incorporating IUS findings effectively reduced inflammation in our IBD patients. IUS should be strongly considered by IBD clinicians in the United States for monitoring disease activity in IBD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246583PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ius findings
12
ius
10
intestinal ultrasound
8
clinical decision-making
8
inflammatory bowel
8
bowel disease
8
united states
8
treatment plan
8
patients ius
8
correlated ius
8

Similar Publications