A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Modification of Sagittal Split Osteotomy in Class II Asymmetry: Optimizing Bone Contact between Proximal and Distal Segments. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Computer-assisted surgical simulation (CASS) allows more precise orthognathic surgery. However, few studies have evaluated associations between CASS-designed bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) and bone contact surface in class II mandibular asymmetry. This study aims to evaluate the effects of using computer-assisted simulation and design modification of SSO to improve bony contact in skeletal class II asymmetry.

Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed 28 patients with class II asymmetry who underwent orthognathic surgery, including 15 with modified SSO (group CS) and 13 with conventional SSO (group C). Modified SSO was designed under CASS. Operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and complications were collected and compared between the two groups.

Results: Bony contact was found at the distal end of the proximal segment in all group CS patients, while bone gap was noted in all group C patients ( P < 0.05). Moreover, bone graft was used in four group C patients but was not used in all cases in group CS patients ( P < 0.05). A trend toward lower operative time or perioperative bleeding was noted in group CS, but without statistical significance. After 1-year follow-up, inferior alveolar nerve disturbances were noted in two group CS patients and one group C patient. Palpable bone gap with uneven jaw line was noted in two group C patients 1 year after surgery and one patient received fat graft treatment.

Conclusion: The simulation-based SSO modification provides appropriate contact surface and eliminates the bone gap between proximal and distal segments in class II asymmetry.

Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010784DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group patients
24
bone gap
12
group
10
sagittal split
8
split osteotomy
8
class asymmetry
8
bone contact
8
proximal distal
8
distal segments
8
orthognathic surgery
8

Similar Publications