Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Objectives: Physiological loading-induced mechanical environments regulate bone modeling and remodeling. Thus, loading-induced normal strain is typically considered a stimulus to osteogenesis. However, several studies noticed new bone formation near the sites of minimal normal strain, e.g., the neutral axis of bending in long bones, which raises a question on how bone mass is maintained near these sites. Secondary mechanical components such as shear strain and interstitial fluid flow also stimulate bone cells and regulate bone mass. However, the osteogenic potential of these components is not well established. Accordingly, the present study estimates the distribution of physiological muscle loading-induced mechanical environments such as normal strain, shear strain, pore pressure, and interstitial fluid flow in long bones.
Methods: A poroelastic finite element muscle standardized femur (MuscleSF) model is developed to compute the distribution of the mechanical environment as a function of bone porosities associated with osteoporotic and disuse bone loss.
Results: The results indicate the presence of higher shear strain and interstitial fluid motion near the minimal strain sites, i.e., the neutral axis of bending of femoral cross-sections. This suggests that secondary stimuli may maintain the bone mass at these locations. Pore pressure and interstitial fluid motion reduce with the increased porosity associated with bone disorders, possibly resulting in diminished skeletal mechano-sensitivity to exogenous loading.
Conclusions: These outcomes present a better understanding of mechanical environment-mediated regulation of site-specific bone mass, which can be beneficial in developing prophylactic exercise to prevent bone loss in osteoporosis and muscle disuse.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107592 | DOI Listing |