A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparison between costotransverse foramen block and thoracic paravertebral block for VATS pulmonary resection: A randomized noninferiority trial. | LitMetric

Comparison between costotransverse foramen block and thoracic paravertebral block for VATS pulmonary resection: A randomized noninferiority trial.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: September 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Study Objective: The present study assessed whether costotransverse foramen block (CTFB) is noninferior to thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection.

Design: Single-center, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

Setting: Operating room and intensive care unit or ward in a tertiary hospital.

Patients: Patients aged 20 to 80 years with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 1 to 3 scheduled for elective VATS pulmonary resection.

Interventions: Sixty patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive CTFB or TPVB using 15 mL aliquots of 0.5% ropivacaine at the T4-5 and T6-7 intercostal levels immediately after the induction of general anesthesia.

Measurements: The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10) during 24 h postoperatively (noninferiority limit was 24; NRS 1 per hour). The secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, rescue analgesic use, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pulmonary function, dermatomal spread of the blockade, and quality of recovery.

Main Results: Forty-seven patients were included for final analysis. The difference between the mean 24-h AUCs of NRS in the CTFB (34.25 ± 16.30, n = 24) and TPVB (39.52 ± 17.13, n = 23) groups was -5.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], -15.09 to 4.55), with the upper limit of 95% CI being far below the predefined noninferiority margin of 24. There was no significant difference in the dermatomal spread of the blockades between the groups, as both reached the upper and lower most levels of T3 and T7 (median). Additionally, there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions: The analgesic effect of CTFB was noninferior to that of TPVB during 24 h postoperatively in VATS pulmonary resection. Moreover, CTFB may offer potential safety benefits by keeping the tip of the needle far from the pleura and vascular structure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vats pulmonary
16
costotransverse foramen
8
foramen block
8
thoracic paravertebral
8
paravertebral block
8
pulmonary resection
8
ctfb noninferior
8
24 h postoperatively
8
secondary outcomes
8
dermatomal spread
8

Similar Publications