Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m is considered technically challenging. We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP in men with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m. We interrogated our prospectively maintained RARP database and identified 1273 men who underwent RARP from January 2018 till June 2021. Among them, 43 had BMI ≥ 35 kg/m, and 1230 had BMI < 35 kg/m. A 1:1 genetic matching was performed between these two groups for PSA, Gleason grades, clinical stage, D'Amico risk stratification, and nerve-spare extent. Continence rates and biochemical rates on 1-year follow-up were analysed. We performed statistical analysis using SPSS, and Paired tests were done using Wilcoxon sign rank-sum test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The two groups were comparable in almost all parameters except for age. Console time (p = 0.20) and estimated blood loss (p > 0.90) were not significantly different. There was no blood transfusion, open conversion or (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) intra/postoperative complication in either of the two groups. The two groups did not have any difference in biochemical recurrence rates (BCR) on 1-year follow-up (p > 0.90). Men with BMI ≥ 35 achieved continence rates equivalent to men with BMI < 35 within 1 year. On logistic regression analysis, age (p < 0.001) and extent of nerve sparing (p = 0.026) emerged as significant factors influencing continence recovery. RARP is safe in men with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m. The 1-year continence and oncological outcomes are similar to matched men with BMI < 35 kg/m undergoing RARP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01607-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robot-assisted radical
8
radical prostatectomy
8
matched-pair analysis
8
rarp men
8
functional oncological
4
oncological outcomes
4
outcomes robot-assisted
4
prostatectomy obese
4
men
4
obese men
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: We analyze determinants of postoperative recovery from urinary incontinence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, with a focus on membranous urethral length and inclusion of nerve sparing.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from 2017 to 2022 performed at a single institution. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted for postoperative recovery from urinary incontinence, defined as use of zero or one pad/day.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of day- and night-time pad wetness on 2yrs-QoL after Radical Cystectomy (RC) with Orthotopic Neobladder (ON) from a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) aimed at comparing open RC (ORC) and Robot-Assisted RC (RARC) with intracorporeal (i) ON.

Methods: Between January 2018 and September 2020, 116 patients were enrolled. Data from self-assessed questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BLM30) were collected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: There are no reports of patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. We report the case of a patient who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and colon reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy using the mesenteric approach.

Case Presentation: A 71-year-old male was diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The introduction of novel robotic platforms has expanded surgical options for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, comparative outcomes with da Vinci multiport (MP) system remain unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative, early oncological, and functional outcomes of RARP performed with novel robotic platforms versus the da Vinci MP system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF