Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Impaired ventricular relaxation influences left ventricular pressures during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium-adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA2a) facilitates myocardial relaxation by increasing calcium reuptake and is impaired in HFpEF.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the effects of istaroxime, a SERCA2 agonist, on lusitropic and hemodynamic function during exercise in patients with HFpEF and control subjects.
Methods: Eleven control subjects (7 male, 4 female) and 15 patients with HFpEF (8 male, 7 female) performed upright cycle exercise with right-sided heart catheterization. Participants received istaroxime (0.5 μg/kg/min) or saline placebo (single-blind, crossover design). Cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and diastolic function were measured at rest and during submaximal exercise. In an exploratory analysis (Hedge's g), 7 patients with HFpEF received higher-dose istaroxime (1.0 μg/kg/min). End-systolic elastance (Ees) was calculated by dividing systolic blood pressure (SBP) × 0.9 by end-systolic volume (ESV) (on 3-dimensional echocardiography).
Results: Patients with HFpEF had higher PCWP (25 ± 10 mm Hg vs 12 ± 5 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and lower tissue Doppler velocities during exercise. Istaroxime (0.5 μg/kg/min) had no effect on resting or exercise measures in patients with HFpEF or control subjects. Control subjects had a larger increase in Ees (Δ 1.55 ± 0.99 mm Hg/mL vs Δ 0.86 ± 1.31 mm Hg/mL; P = 0.03), driven by lower ESV. Comparing placebo and istaroxime 1.0 μg/kg/min during exercise, PCWP during the 1.0 μg/kg/min istaroxime dose was slightly lower (Δ 2.2 mm Hg; Hedge's g = 0.30). There were no effects on diastolic function, but there were increases in SBP and s', suggesting a mild inotropic effect.
Conclusions: Low-dose istaroxime had no effect on cardiac filling pressure or parameters of relaxation in patients with HFpEF during exercise. Higher doses of istaroxime may have been more effective in reducing exercise PCWP in patients with HFpEF. (Hemodynamic Response to Exercise in HFpEF Patients After Upregulation of SERCA2a; NCT02772068).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2023.02.006 | DOI Listing |