Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate eye drop self-administration in a low-vision patient population and test whether a nose-pivoted drop delivery device (NPDD, GentleDrop) can improve eye drop delivery in these patients.

Design: Repeated-measures case series.

Participants: Thirty subjects (58 eyes) with low vision, defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/60 or visual field worse than 20° in the better-seeing eye.

Methods: We video-recorded subjects while self-administering eye drops using their own traditional delivery at baseline, after a standardized teaching, and with an NPDD. Two masked graders independently reviewed each drop delivery. Primary success was defined as the drop reaching the eye without the bottle touching the eye or eyelids. Subjects rated ease-of-use (1-10 scale, 10 = easiest) after each drop delivery and completed a satisfaction survey, which included asking whether subjects could place drops independently (1-5 scale, 5 = most independent).

Main Outcome Measures: Logistic-transformed generalized estimating equation regression to compare technique satisfaction, ease-of-use, independence, no contact, and success.

Results: Primary success was observed in 30 (52%) of 58 eyes at baseline and increased to 44 eyes (76%) with an NPDD (P = 0.013). Bottle tip contact occurred in 23 (40%) of 58 eyes at baseline and 8 eyes (14%) with an NPDD (P = 0.004). Mean ease-of-use scores were 6.7 ± 3.1 at baseline and 8.3 ± 1.8 (P < 0.001) with an NPDD. Likewise, the NPDD improved success, bottle tip contact, and ease-of-use compared with post-teaching traditional delivery (P < 0.01). Twenty-two (73%) of 30 subjects preferred the NPDD to traditional delivery. Twenty-nine (97%) thought the NPDD was comfortable to use, and all would recommend the device. A subgroup analysis was performed on 16 subjects that self-reported difficulty instilling drops at baseline. The NPDD showed similar results, and it increased confidence in placing drops independently (4.6 ± 0.9) compared with baseline (2.7 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Fifteen (94%) subjects in this subgroup preferred the NPDD.

Conclusions: Low-vision subjects struggled to self-administer eye drops. An NPDD can improve bottle tip contact, ease-of-use, satisfaction, and independence. Eye care providers could consider screening low-vision patients about difficulty with eye drop self-administration and recommending eye drop aids.

Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2023.04.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eye drop
20
drop delivery
16
eye drops
12
traditional delivery
12
bottle contact
12
eye
11
npdd
10
drop
9
low vision
8
drop self-administration
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To investigate hand function and eye drop instillation success in adults with and without glaucoma.

Design: Cross-sectional pilot study.

Subjects: Adults aged ≥ 65 years with glaucoma who use eye drops daily and adults aged 65+ without glaucoma who do not regularly use eye drops.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Clinical application prospects and challenges of preservative-free anti-glaucoma drugs].

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi

September 2025

Aier Glaucoma Institute, Hunan Engineering Research Center for Glaucoma with Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Application of New Materials, Changsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha 410015, China.

As the world's leading irreversible blinding eye disease, glaucoma is predominantly managed with pharmaceutical interventions in clinical practice. However, long-term use of traditional eye drops containing preservatives (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread chronic condition caused by immune responses involving immunoglobulin E (IgE) when exposed to airborne allergens. It frequently coexists with conditions such as asthma and eye inflammation and represents a major public health issue due to its significant burden and associated disabilities across the globe. Key contributing factors include exposure to airborne or workplace-related allergens and hereditary predispositions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study evaluated changes in ocular parameters in patients with progressive myopia receiving 0.01% atropine.

Material And Methods: The study included 35 children (18 girls, 51.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF