A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Assessing the preventive effect of immediate lymphatic reconstruction on the upper extremity lymphedema. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: An immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) combining axillary reverse lymphatic mapping (ARLM) and lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been gradually in the spotlight as a novel surgical technique to prevent lymphedema. In this study, we investigate the preventive effect of ILR for the risk of upper extremity lymphedema. We will compare the incidence of postoperative lymphedema between the ILR treatment group and the no-try or failure group during the same period with analysis of the effects of different variables.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 213 patients who had undergone mastectomy for node-positive unilateral breast cancer in our institution between November 1, 2019 and February 28, 2021. To assess the effect of preventive ILR, we divided the patients into a treatment group (n=30) and a control group (n=183). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between ILR and lymphedema occurrence.

Results: Of the 30 patients who were attempted, we successfully performed ILRs in 26 patients (86.7%). During a mean follow-up of 14 months, one patient (3.8%) was confirmed to have upper extremity lymphedema in the treatment group, whereas 14 out of 183 patients (7.7%) were diagnosed in the control group. In multivariate analysis, ILR success showed a borderline significant decrease in risk of lymphedema [hazard ratio (HR) =0.174; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.022-1.374; P=0.097].

Conclusions: Our results suggested that ILR may be a promising surgical treatment to prevent postoperative lymphedema. There is a need for larger studies with longer follow-up to confirm the findings obtained in our study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086774PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-554DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper extremity
12
extremity lymphedema
12
treatment group
12
lymphatic reconstruction
8
lymphedema
8
preventive ilr
8
postoperative lymphedema
8
control group
8
ilr
7
group
6

Similar Publications