Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Temporary and persistent visual phenomena are a frequent reason for a neurological presentation. The diagnosis can usually be made with the help of a structured anamnesis with determination of the time of onset, the course and symptoms as well as the monocular vs. binocular manifestation. The visual aura in migraine is certainly the most frequent entity to be differentiated. In particular, persistent visual phenomena such as visual snow syndrome, hallucinogen persisting perception disorder and the Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) seem to be underdiagnosed in clinical practice for various reasons and are probably not that rare. Instrumental diagnostics are mostly used for exclusion diagnostics and are a component of a complete patient education, but can be indicative for certain questions (CBS, epilepsy). This article presents the most frequent visual phenomena from the neurological practice and their differential diagnoses, guided by a case history.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-023-01466-8 | DOI Listing |