Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Experimental uncertainty will impact in silico model calculations of aerosol delivery and deposition. Patient-specific dosimetry models are often parameterized based on medical imaging data, which contain inherent experimental variability.
Methods: Here, we created and parameterized 1D models of three subject-specific asthmatic subjects and randomly assigned perturbations of up to 15 % on airway diameter, segmental volume, and defected volume. Sensitivity of imaging data experimental variability on dosimetry metrics were quantified.
Results: Lobar particle delivery primarily depended on the distal segmental volumes; 15 % range of noise resulted in delivery to the upper right lobe to vary at most from 15.2 and 18.2 % for one of the severe subjects. Particle deposition was most sensitive to airway diameter; 95 % confidence intervals spanned from 8 to 10.6 % in the mild/moderate subject for 15 % variation on input metrics for 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles. While these results provide possible ranges of dosimetry calculations for a specific subject, the perturbations were not sufficient to model the large observed inter-subject variability (8.9, 19, and 14.5 % deposition, subjects 1--3, respectively, 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles).
Conclusion: This study highlights that in silico model predictions are robust in the presence of experimental uncertainty and that it continues to be necessary to perform subject-specific simulations, especially within the presence of heterogeneous airway disease.
Significance: Sensitivity analysis provides confidence in calculating deposition in the airways of asthmatic subjects within the presence of experimental uncertainty.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2023.3255784 | DOI Listing |