A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Dosimetry Sensitivity in a Lower Dimensional Model of Patient-Specific Asthma Subjects. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Experimental uncertainty will impact in silico model calculations of aerosol delivery and deposition. Patient-specific dosimetry models are often parameterized based on medical imaging data, which contain inherent experimental variability.

Methods: Here, we created and parameterized 1D models of three subject-specific asthmatic subjects and randomly assigned perturbations of up to 15 % on airway diameter, segmental volume, and defected volume. Sensitivity of imaging data experimental variability on dosimetry metrics were quantified.

Results: Lobar particle delivery primarily depended on the distal segmental volumes; 15 % range of noise resulted in delivery to the upper right lobe to vary at most from 15.2 and 18.2 % for one of the severe subjects. Particle deposition was most sensitive to airway diameter; 95 % confidence intervals spanned from 8 to 10.6 % in the mild/moderate subject for 15 % variation on input metrics for 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles. While these results provide possible ranges of dosimetry calculations for a specific subject, the perturbations were not sufficient to model the large observed inter-subject variability (8.9, 19, and 14.5 % deposition, subjects 1--3, respectively, 5 [Formula: see text] diameter particles).

Conclusion: This study highlights that in silico model predictions are robust in the presence of experimental uncertainty and that it continues to be necessary to perform subject-specific simulations, especially within the presence of heterogeneous airway disease.

Significance: Sensitivity analysis provides confidence in calculating deposition in the airways of asthmatic subjects within the presence of experimental uncertainty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2023.3255784DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

experimental uncertainty
12
silico model
8
imaging data
8
asthmatic subjects
8
airway diameter
8
[formula text]
8
text] diameter
8
presence experimental
8
subjects
5
experimental
5

Similar Publications