Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) is the primary cholesterol target for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although beta-quantitation (BQ) is the gold standard to determine LDLC levels accurately, many clinical laboratories apply the Friedewald equation to calculate LDLC. As LDLC is an important risk factor for CVD, we evaluated the accuracy of Friedewald and alternative equations (Martin/Hopkins and Sampson) for LDLC.

Methods: We calculated LDLC based on three equations (Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins and Sampson) using the total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) in commutable serum samples measured by clinical laboratories participating in the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) external quality assessment (EQA) programme over a 5 years period (number of datasets, n=345). LDLC calculated from the equations were comparatively evaluated against the reference values, determined from BQ-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) with traceability to the International System of Units (SI).

Results: Among the three equations, Martin/Hopkins equation derived LDLC had the best linearity against direct measured (y=1.141x - 14.403; R=0.8626) and traceable LDLC (y=1.1692x - 22.137; R=0.9638). Martin/Hopkins equation (R=0.9638) had the strongest R in association with traceable LDLC compared with the Friedewald (R=0.9262) and Sampson (R=0.9447) equation. The discordance with traceable LDLC was the lowest in Martin/Hopkins (median=-0.725%, IQR=6.914%) as compared to Friedewald (median=-4.094%, IQR=10.305%) and Sampson equation (median=-1.389%, IQR=9.972%). Martin/Hopkins was found to result in the lowest number of misclassifications, whereas Friedewald had the most numbers of misclassification. Samples with high TG, low HDLC and high LDLC had no misclassification by Martin/Hopkins equation, but Friedewald equation resulted in ∼50% misclassification in these samples.

Conclusions: The Martin/Hopkins equation was found to achieve better agreement with the LDLC reference values as compared to Friedewald and Sampson equations, especially in samples with high TG and low HDLC. Martin/Hopkins derived LDLC also enabled a more accurate classification of LDLC levels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1301DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

martin/hopkins equation
16
ldlc
14
lipoprotein cholesterol
12
traceable ldlc
12
compared friedewald
12
martin/hopkins
9
low-density lipoprotein
8
ldlc levels
8
clinical laboratories
8
friedewald
8

Similar Publications

Lipid Ratio Plot: A Simple Graphical Approach for Investigating the Accuracy of LDL Cholesterol Equations or Direct Assays.

J Appl Lab Med

September 2025

Lipoprotein Metabolism Laboratory, Translational Vascular Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Background: β-Quantification (BQ) is the reference method for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) determination. It is not widely available, making it challenging for laboratories to assess the accuracy of LDL-C methods. Our goal was to develop an indirect graphical approach for comparing LDL-C test results to the BQ reference method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Modified Sampson-NIH Equation with Improved Accuracy for Estimating Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol.

Clin Chem

July 2025

Lipoprotein Metabolism Laboratory, Translational Vascular Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Background: Cardiovascular guidelines have long recommended low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as the primary target for lipid-lowering therapy. Recent guidelines have emphasized the importance of achieving low LDL-C levels; hence, the accurate measurement of low LDL-C is increasingly clinically relevant.

Methods: Using lipid panel test results from the Mayo Clinic (n = 24 590) and the FOURIER clinical trial of evolocumab (n = 9605), the following modified Sampson equation was developed by least-squares regression to match LDL-C (mg/dL) by the β-quantification reference method, by combining terms into non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (nonHDLC = Total Cholesterol - High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) and forcing the coefficient to be one.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, is typically calculated using the Friedewald formula when triglyceride (TG) levels are below 400 mg/dL. Recent studies have demonstrated the superior accuracy of the Martin-Hopkins method across diverse populations. While this method estimates very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) using strata-specific median TG/VLDL-C ratios, its reliance on median statistics raises questions about whether these ratios are truly optimal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: A paradigm shift is occurring in lipid testing, as fasting is no longer required. We aimed to determine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations calculated using three different equations, along with the components used in these calculations, vary with different fasting durations in routine clinical practice.

Materials And Methods: The concentrations of LDL-C were calculated using the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations, along with the lipid components involved in these equations, depending on time since the last meal in a cohort of 77,300 outpatients at a community hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF