Robotic assistance in lumbar fusion surgery: trends and patterns from 2016-2019.

Eur Spine J

Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.

Published: June 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Robotic-assisted spine surgery is an emerging field that is growing in utilization. Intraoperative robotic surgical units cost upwards of $600,000 for medical facilities to purchase. Despite significant cost barriers, these devices are highly marketable for hospitals and physicians.

Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age who underwent elective lumbar spinal fusion. Trends of robotic-assisted lumbar fusion were examined over time, as well as stratified based on patient and surgical characteristics.

Results: A total of 176,377 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall rate of robotic-assisted lumbar fusion was 1.2% (2,131/174,246). Patients with private insurance were more likely to receive robotic-assisted lumbar fusion (40.3% vs. 37.5%; p < 0.05). Stratifying by race, whites were more likely to receive robotic-assisted lumbar fusion (84.1% vs. 79.5%; p < 0.05). Patients who underwent robotic-assisted lumbar fusion were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis compared to those that underwent non-robotic-assisted lumbar fusion (25.9% vs. 22.0%; p < 0.05). Patients with lumbar fusion done via the anterior approach were more likely to have robotic-assisted surgery compared to other approaches (25.2% vs. 21.3; p < 0.05). Overall, there was a steady increase in its use over time, with patients who underwent lumbar fusion procedures four times more likely to receive robotic assistance in 2019 compared to 2016 (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.5-4.6; p < 0.0001). Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion was associated with higher inpatient costs ($170,036.40 vs. $139,026.10; p < 0.0001) despite having equivalent length of stay (3.31 ± 2.6 vs.3.37 ± 2.6; p = 0.06).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion is on the rise. Patients who had private insurance, were diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, and who had lumbar fusion via the anterior approach were more likely to undergo lumbar fusion using robotic assistance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07663-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbar fusion
16
robotic-assisted lumbar
12
inclusion criteria
8
lumbar
5
fusion
5
robotic assistance
4
assistance lumbar
4
fusion surgery
4
surgery trends
4
trends patterns
4

Similar Publications

For lumbar spinal canal stenosis, endoscopic spine surgery typically employs a unilateral approach. While this approach has the advantage of early access to the lamina, it risks damage to the facet joint on the entry side. Additionally, decompression of the ipsilateral lateral recess can be challenging, sometimes resulting in inadequate decompression laterally, leading to incomplete symptom relief.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the ability of large language models (LLMs) to accurately simplify lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports.

Materials And Methods: Patients who underwent lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery in 2022 at one tertiary academic medical center were queried using appropriate CPT codes. We then identified all patients with a preoperative ICD diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis and extracted the latest preoperative spine MRI radiology report text.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Single-position prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (PTP-LLIF) is an evolving minimally invasive surgery technique that merges the biomechanical and anatomical advantages of prone positioning with the LLIF approach. While PTP-LLIF enhances lumbar lordosis restoration and operative efficiency by eliminating patient repositioning, it presents unique ergonomic and visualization challenges for surgeons. This technical report describes a novel modification of the technique using the Teligen camera to improve intraoperative visualization and reduce surgeon fatigue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF