A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effects of a concurrent exercise training program on low back and sciatic pain and pain disability in late pregnancy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore the influence of a concurrent exercise (aerobic + resistance) training program, from the 17th gestational week (g.w.) until birth on low back and sciatic pain, and pain disability. A total of 93 pregnant women divided into exercise (n = 49) and control (n = 44) groups followed a 60-min, 3 days/week, concurrent exercise training.

Methods: Low back and sciatic pain were measured with a Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). The disability resulting from pain was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Measures were performed at the 16th and 34th g.w.

Results: The exercise group increased 21.9 mm less the VAS low back (between-group differences (B): 95% CI: -33.6 to -10.2; p < 0.001) and 12.9 mm less the VAS sciatica score (between-group differences: 95% CI (B): -21.8 to -4.0; p = 0.005) than the control group. Regarding the ODI questionnaire, the exercise group increased 0.7, 0.5, and 0.7 less than the control group in pain while sleeping (between-group differences (B): 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.01; p = 0.025), pain while lifting weight (between-group differences (B): 95% CI: -0.9 to -0.01; p = 0.016), and limitations of the social life due to pain (between-group differences(B): 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.06; p = 0.032). Furthermore, the exercise group suffered 6.9% less pain than the control group in the ODI total score (between-group differences (B): 95% CI: -13.9 to 0.053; p = 0.052).

Conclusion: This concurrent exercise training program adapted to pregnant women improved pain compared to controls.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.14353DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

concurrent exercise
12
low sciatic
12
sciatic pain
12
training program
8
pain pain
8
pain disability
8
pain
6
exercise
5
effects concurrent
4
exercise training
4

Similar Publications