A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Evaluation of Worker Exposure to Airborne Silica Dust During Five OSHA Table I Construction Tasks. | LitMetric

The Evaluation of Worker Exposure to Airborne Silica Dust During Five OSHA Table I Construction Tasks.

Ann Work Expo Health

Safety, Health, and Industrial Hygiene Department, Montana Technological University, 1300, West Park Street, Butte, MT 59701, USA.

Published: June 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Fifty-one (51) personal silica air samples were collected over 13 days on 19 construction employees while they performed five different construction tasks found in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) respirable crystalline silica standard for construction, Table 1, which specifies engineering, work practice, and respiratory protection controls that employers can use in lieu of exposure monitoring to adhere to the standard. The average construction task time was 127 min (range: 18-240 min) with a mean respirable silica concentration of 85 μg m-3 (standard deviation [SD] = 176.2) for all 51 measured exposures. At least one OSHA-specified silica dust control measure was used during all 51 samples collected. The mean silica concentrations for the five tasks were: core drilling 11.2 μg m-3 (SD = 5.31 μg m-3), cutting with a walk-behind saw 126 μg m-3 (SD = 115 μg m-3), dowel drilling 99.9 μg m-3 (SD = 58.7 μg m-3), grinding 172 μg m-3 (SD = 145 μg m-3), and jackhammering 23.2 μg m-3 (SD = 5.19 μg m-3). Twenty four of 51 (47.1%) workers were exposed above the OSHA Action Level (AL) of 25 μg m-3 and 15 of 51 (29.4%) were exposed above the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 μg m-3 when exposures were extrapolated to an 8-h shift. When silica exposures were extrapolated to 4 h, 15 of 51 (29.4%) of workers sampled were exposed over the OSHA AL and 8 of 51 (15.7%) were exposed over the OSHA PEL. A total of 15 area airborne respirable crystalline silica samples were collected on days where the personal task-based silica samples were taken, with an average sampling time of 187 min. Of the 15 area respirable crystalline silica samples, only four were greater than the laboratory reporting limit of 5 μg m-3. The four area silica samples with reportable concentrations revealed background silica concentrations of 23 μg m-3, 5 μg m-3, 40 μg m-3, and 100 μg m-3. Odds ratios were used to analyze the apparent association between dichotomous background construction site exposures to respirable crystalline silica (detectable or not detectable), and personal exposure category (over or not over the OSHA AL and PEL) when exposure times were extrapolated to 8 h. The associations were strongly positive and significant between detectable background exposures and personal overexposures for workers conducting the five Table 1 tasks with engineering controls in place. The results of this study suggest that exposure to hazardous levels of respirable crystalline silica may be present even when OSHA-specified engineering controls are implemented. The current study findings also suggest that background construction site silica concentrations may potentially cause task-based overexposures, even when the OSHA Table 1 control methods have been put in place.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxad012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

μg m-3
72
respirable crystalline
20
crystalline silica
20
μg
18
m-3
18
exposed osha
16
silica samples
16
silica
15
samples collected
12
silica concentrations
12

Similar Publications