Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Hypothesis: Cognitive remediation (CR) benefits cognition and functioning in psychosis but we do not know the optimal level of therapist contact, so we evaluated the potential benefits of different CR modes.

Study Design: A multi-arm, multi-center, single-blinded, adaptive trial of therapist-supported CR. Participants from 11 NHS early intervention psychosis services were independently randomized to Independent, Group, One-to-One, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU). The primary outcome was functional recovery (Goal Attainment Scale [GAS]) at 15-weeks post randomization. Independent and TAU arms were closed after an interim analysis, and three informative contrasts tested (Group vs One-to-One, Independent vs TAU, Group + One-to-One vs TAU). Health economic analyses considered the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). All analyses used intention-to-treat principles.

Study Results: We analyzed 377 participants (65 Independent, 134 Group, 112 One-to-One, 66 TAU). GAS did not differ for Group vs One-to-One: Cohen's d: 0.07, -0.25 to 0.40 95% CI, P = .655; Independent vs TAU: Cohen's d: 0.07, -0.41 to 0.55 95% CI, P = .777. GAS and the cognitive score improved for Group + One-to-One vs TAU favoring CR (GAS: Cohen's d: 0.57, 0.19-0.96 95% CI, P = .003; Cognitive score: Cohens d: 0.28, 0.07-0.48 95% CI, P = .008). The QALY costs were £4306 for Group vs TAU and £3170 for One-to-One vs TAU. Adverse events did not differ between treatment methods and no serious adverse events were related to treatment.

Conclusions: Both active therapist methods provided cost-effective treatment benefiting functional recovery in early psychosis and should be adopted within services. Some individuals benefited more than others so needs further investigation.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN14678860 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14678860Now closed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154711PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac214DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group one-to-one
12
independent tau
12
tau
9
cognitive remediation
8
functional recovery
8
group + one-to-one tau
8
one-to-one tau
8
cohen's 007
8
cognitive score
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Pharmacy students were given the opportunity to participate in an online video-recorded objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with pharmacist feedback. This study aimed to evaluate their views and experiences regarding this initiative and reviewing the recording.

Methods: Third year undergraduate pharmacy students (n = 68) were invited to participate in a formative video-recorded OSCE station online, followed by a one-to-one feedback discussion with a pharmacist facilitator.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still controversial for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. This multicenter cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LMCA disease patients who underwent PCI or CABG. We reviewed 875 consecutive patients diagnosed with LMCA disease between January 2009 and December 2020 who underwent coronary revascularization by PCI (n = 404) or CABG (n = 471).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Few data are available on the impact of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Objective: We conducted a retrospective study using TriNetX to compare the outcomes of patients with IBD and those with concomitant IBD and PSC.

Methods: All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), or indeterminate colitis with or without PSC were eligible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: There are more than 10 million deaf or hard of hearing people in the UK. While the deaf and hard of hearing population is heterogeneous, many of those with profound hearing loss are part of deaf communities (UK estimate around 120 000) which are defined minority communities. Many members of deaf communities are sign language users.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF