Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To establish consensus definitions for necrotising otitis externa (NOE) to facilitate the diagnosis and exclusion of NOE in clinical practice and expedite future high-quality study of this neglected condition.

Design: The work comprised of a systematic review of the literature, five iterative rounds of consultation via a Delphi process and open discussion within the collaborative. An expert panel analysed the results to produce the final outputs which were shared with and endorsed by national specialty bodies.

Setting: Secondary care in the UK.

Participants: UK clinical specialists practising in infection, ear nose and throat (ENT) surgery or radiology.

Main Outcome Measures: Definitions and statements meeting the following criteria were accepted: (a) minimum of 70% of respondents in agreement or strong agreement with a definition/statement AND (b) <15% of respondents in disagreement or strong disagreement with a definition/statement.

Results: Seventy-four UK clinicians specialising in ENT, Infection and Radiology with a special interest in NOE took part in the work which was undertaken between 2019 and 2021. The minimum response rate for a Round was 76%. Consensus criteria for all proposed case definitions, outcome definitions and consensus statements were met in the fifth round.

Conclusions: This work distills the clinical opinion of a large group of multidisciplinary specialists from across the UK to create practical definitions and statements to support clinical practice and research for NOE. This is the first step in an iterative process. Further work will seek to validate and test these definitions and inform their evolution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9945308PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consensus definitions
8
definitions necrotising
8
necrotising otitis
8
otitis externa
8
externa delphi
4
delphi study
4
study objective
4
objective establish
4
establish consensus
4
externa noe
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine through a Delphi process a list of outcomes measures for clinicians to use when assessing individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS).

Methods: A three-phase Delphi process was conducted by the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS) Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Taskforce, including two online surveys, two virtual meetings, and three in-person consensus meetings at the ISSLS annual conferences (2023-2025). Participants evaluated and ranked outcome measures for LSS, with final endorsement requiring > 66% agreement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Differentiating periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) from aseptic failure is challenging in total joint arthroplasty. To date, there is no consensus about the most accurate criteria to diagnose PJI. The current study compares common diagnostic PJI criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (pCIA) is a distressing side effect of antineoplastic agents, imposing significant psychological burdens on cancer survivors. Despite its impact, there are no standardized guidelines for diagnosis, prevention or management.

Objective: To establish consensus-based definitions, diagnostic criteria, grading systems and management recommendations for pCIA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Polytrauma patients are defined by the Berlin Consensus as those with severe injuries across multiple regions and require complex, adaptable treatment approaches to address both immediate and long-term needs of the patient, while considering the resource availability. This review evaluates early total care (ETC), which attempts early definitive fixation, against damage control orthopedics (DCO), which focuses on temporary stabilization to reduce physiological strain from surgery. While ETC promotes early mobilization, DCO reduces risks and subsequent complications associated with the "second hit" phenomenon in critically ill patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Efforts to strengthen healthcare systems have led to the development of clinical practice guidance, defined as clinical decision-making aids built on scientific evidence, experiential knowledge, and ideally, patient values. This review evaluates the accessibility, relevance, and quality of existing trauma guidance globally.

Methods: A systematic review evaluated trauma-related clinical guidance sources published from 2016 to 2023, searching in English across eight databases and 28 professional society websites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF