Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Background: Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal.
Methods: A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion.
Results: Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients.
Conclusion: Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization.
Level Of Evidence: III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002343 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
[Management of forearm shaft fractures : Challenges and solution approaches].
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Breslauer Straße 201, 90471, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Forearm shaft fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity in young adults. By definition, these fractures are diaphyseal fractures; however, due to the complex functional unity formed by the forearm shaft during motion both bone forearm fractures are treated as intra-articular fractures [1, 3]. This is why the gold standard of treatment in adults is osteosynthesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFunctional and Radiographic Outcomes After Surgical Management of Complex Proximal Ulna Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
September 2025
Introduction: Complex proximal ulna fractures (including comminuted olecranon fractures and fracture-dislocations of the elbow) pose challenging management due to concomitant injuries to key stabilizers (radial head, coronoid process, and collateral ligaments). This study evaluates functional and radiographic outcomes following surgical treatment and explores the prognostic value of associated injuries, age stratification, and a new coronoid-centric classification system.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 43 patients with complex proximal ulna fractures treated between 2019 and 2024, with a minimum of 12 months follow-up (mean, 28 months).
Challenges in Diagnosing Pediatric Monteggia Fractures: Role of Clinical Experience and Imaging.
Medicina (Kaunas)
August 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
: Monteggia fracture-dislocations are rare but critical injuries in children. Accurate early diagnosis is essential to avoid long-term complications; however, such injuries are frequently missed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Monteggia fractures among physicians of varying specialties and experience levels and to identify factors influencing diagnostic performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhat happens to the elbow 15 years after a radial head prosthesis? A clinical and imaging long-term follow-up study.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
August 2025
Shoulder and Elbow Unit - IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna. Italy.
Background: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has increasingly become the standard treatment for non-reconstructable radial head fractures, especially in young active patients where long-lasting function restoration is of paramount importance. However, long-term evidence of the results over time is still scarce. The purpose of this study was to document the long-term outcomes of RHA for acute radial head fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImpact of ulnar fracture level on radial head dislocation: A Monteggia fracture study.
J Chin Med Assoc
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Background: Monteggia fracture is defined as a combination of proximal ulnar fracture with radial head dislocation. Radial head dislocation may be misdiagnosed under elbow X-ray, leading to further complications. This study aimed to compare the ulnar fracture pattern characteristics between Monteggia fracture and an isolated proximal ulnar fracture in terms of how close the fracture site is to the coronoid and what type of fracture pattern is more likely to result in radial head dislocation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF