98%
921
2 minutes
20
Rationale/objectives: Despite plausible pathophysiological mechanisms, more research is needed to confirm the relationship between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and the risk of COVID-19 infection or COVID-19-related serious complications.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada). Adults with physician-diagnosed OSA who received positive airway pressure therapy in the 5 years prepandemic () were propensity score matched by baseline characteristics to individuals in the general population at low risk of OSA () using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Weighted HRs of (1) a positive COVID-19 test and (2) COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality, within 12 months of pandemic onset, were compared between groups. We also evaluated the impact of comorbid cardiometabolic or chronic airways disease.
Results: We identified and matched 324 029 individuals in the OSA group to 4 588 200 individuals in the non-OSA group. Compared with the non-OSA group, those in the OSA group were at a greater hazard of testing positive for COVID-19 (HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.21), having a COVID-19-related ED visit (HR=1.62, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.73), hospitalisation (HR=1.50, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.65) or ICU admission (HR=1.53, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.84). COVID-19-related 30-day mortality was not different (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.16).We found that for the OSA group, comorbid airways disease but not cardiometabolic conditions increased the hazards of COVID-19-related outcomes, including mortality.
Conclusion: In this large population-based study, we demonstrated that a recent diagnosis of OSA requiring treatment was associated with an increased hazard of testing positive for COVID-19 and serious COVID-19-related complications, particularly in those with co-existing chronic airways disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-219574 | DOI Listing |
Vaccine
September 2025
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Background: Among pregnant and postpartum women, decision-making for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is influenced by vaccine safety concerns, misconceptions, shifting vaccine policies, and exclusion in the initial vaccine rollout. This caused confusion and vaccine hesitancy among many groups including pregnant and postpartum women.
Objective: The objective of this study was to understand the multilevel factors that influence vaccine decision-making among pregnant and postpartum women in Pakistan, which is crucial for improving vaccine demand among the vulnerable group-pregnant and postpartum women.
Chest
September 2025
Child and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Background: Managing bronchiectasis exacerbations is a priority for patients/parents/caregivers of children with bronchiectasis, yet evidence-based strategies among the pediatric population remain limited.
Research Question: Does the use of a personalized, written bronchiectasis action management plan (BAMP), compared to standard care, reduce non-scheduled doctor visits among children/adolescents with chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD)/bronchiectasis?
Study Design And Methods: Our multicenter, double-blind, superiority, randomized controlled trial enrolled children from three Australian respiratory departments between June 2018 and December 2020. Children/adolescents aged <19 years with CSLD/bronchiectasis were randomized to receive a personalized BAMP (intervention) or standard care (controls).
Epidemiol Serv Saude
September 2025
Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Objective: To analyze the use of teledentistry in Primary Healthcare in Brazil at the end of the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Cross-sectional study with dentists and dental surgeons in Primary Healthcare. Study data were obtained through an online form.
Cien Saude Colet
August 2025
School of Public Health, Harvard University. Boston Estados Unidos.
In this multicenter, cross-sectional and quantitative study we evaluated the influence of urban violence and COVID-19 on the work process and team rapport of community health workers (CHWs) in eight municipalities of Northeastern Brazil. The collected information covered sociodemographics, work routines, exposure to violence, self-efficacy and coronavirus anxiety. A logistic regression was performed using as outcome variable the answer to the question: "Do you think your team work process changed during the pandemic?" The sample included 1,944 CHWs, of whom 56.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
September 2025
Mental Health Research Institute, National Center for Mental Health, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly affected physical and mental health. Since the onset of the pandemic, the prevalence of depression and anxiety has significantly increased. Quarantine and social distancing, implemented to control the spread of COVID-19, have exacerbated social isolation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF