A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Obturator Nerve Injury in Robotic Pelvic Surgery: Scenarios and Management Strategies. | LitMetric

Obturator Nerve Injury in Robotic Pelvic Surgery: Scenarios and Management Strategies.

Eur Urol

The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address:

Published: April 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Obturator nerve injury (ONI) is an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, usually reported in 0.2-5.7% of cases undergoing surgical treatment of urological and gynecological malignancies involving pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).

Objective: To describe how an ONI may occur during robotic pelvic surgery and the corresponding management strategies.

Design, Setting, And Participants: We retrospectively analyzed video content on intraoperative ONI provided by robotic surgeons from high-volume centers.

Surgical Procedure: ONI was identified during PLND and managed according to the type of nerve injury.

Results And Limitations: The management approach varies with the type of injury. Crush injury frequently occurs at an advanced stage of PLND. For a crush injury to the obturator nerve caused by a clip, management only requires its safe removal. Three situations can occur if the nerve is transected: (1) transection with feasible approximation and tension-free nerve anastomosis; (2) transection with challenging approximation requiring certain strategies for proper nerve anastomosis; and (3) transection with a hidden proximal nerve ending that may initially appear intact, but is clearly injured when revealed by further dissection. Each case has different management strategies with a common aim of prompt repair of the anatomic disruption to restore proper nerve conduction.

Conclusions: ONI is a preventable complication that requires proper identification of the anatomy and high-risk areas when performing pelvic lymph node dissection. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair using the management strategies described offer patients the best chance of recovery without sequelae.

Patient Summary: We describe the different ways in which the obturator nerve in the pelvic area can be damaged during urological or gynecological surgeries. This is a preventable complication and we describe how it can be avoided and different management options, depending on the type of nerve injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

obturator nerve
16
nerve injury
12
pelvic surgery
12
management strategies
12
nerve
10
robotic pelvic
8
urological gynecological
8
pelvic lymph
8
lymph node
8
node dissection
8

Similar Publications