Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Patient-specific simulation allows the surgeon to plan and rehearse the surgical approach ahead of time. Preoperative clinical imaging for this purpose requires time-consuming manual processing and segmentation of landmarks such as the facial nerve. We aimed to evaluate an automated pipeline with minimal manual interaction for processing clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) temporal bone imaging for patient-specific virtual reality (VR) simulation.
Study Design: Prospective image processing of retrospective imaging series.
Setting: Academic hospital.
Methods: Eleven CBCTs were selected based on quality and used for validation of the processing pipeline. A larger naturalistic sample of 36 CBCTs were obtained to explore parameters for successful processing and feasibility for patient-specific VR simulation.Visual inspection and quantitative metrics were used to validate the accuracy of automated segmentation compared with manual segmentation. Range of acceptable rotational offsets and translation point selection variability were determined. Finally, feasibility in relation to image acquisition quality, processing time, and suitability for VR simulation was evaluated.
Results: The performance of automated segmentation was acceptable compared with manual segmentation as reflected in the quantitative metrics. Total time for processing for new data sets was on average 8.3 minutes per data set; of this, it was less than 30 seconds for manual steps. Two of the 36 data sets failed because of extreme rotational offset, but overall the registration routine was robust to rotation and manual selection of a translational reference point. Another seven data sets had successful automated segmentation but insufficient suitability for VR simulation.
Conclusion: Automated processing of CBCT imaging has potential for preoperative VR simulation but requires further refinement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003771 | DOI Listing |