Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: RET (rearranged during transfection) kinase, as a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase, is a therapeutic target for several human cancer such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and thyroid cancer. Pralsetinib is a recently approved drug for the treatment of RET-driven NSCLC and thyroid cancers. A single point mutation G810C at the C-lobe of the RET kinase causes pralsetinib resistance to this non-gatekeeper variant. However, the detailed mechanism remains poorly understood.
Methods: Here, multiple microsecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics/generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) binding free energy calculations, and community network analysis were performed to reveal the mechanism of pralsetinib resistance to the RET G810C mutant.
Results: The simulations showed that the G810C mutation had a minor effect on the overall conformational dynamics of the RET kinase domain. Energetic analysis suggested that the G810C mutation reduced the binding affinity of pralsetinib to the mutant. Per-residue energy contribution and structural analyses revealed that the hydrogen bonding interactions between pralsetinib and the hinge residues Glu805 and Ala807 were disrupted in the G810C mutant, which were responsible for the decreased binding affinity of pralsetinib to the mutant.
Conclusions: The obtained results may provide understanding of the mechanism of pralsetinib resistance to the non-gatekeeper RET G810C mutant.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-022-05429-9 | DOI Listing |