Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743475 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-756ED | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Factors associated with James Cook University medical students experiencing 'high quality' clinical learning on final-year rural placement.
Rural Remote Health
June 2025
College of Medicine & Dentistry, James Cook University, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia.
Introduction: The James Cook University (JCU) medical school in Australia has a mission to produce graduates committed and competent to practise in local regional, rural and remote areas. As positive rural placement experiences are known to enhance interest in a rural career and generalist medicine, this study explores key factors contributing to JCU medical students having a 'high quality' rural clinical learning experience during their final-year rural placement.
Methods: This sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study included four focus groups (n=17) and a one-on-one interview followed by a cross-sectional survey (n=71; response rate=45%) of final-year JCU medical students in 2023.
Children can consider social relationships when evaluating liars.
J Exp Child Psychol
December 2025
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Two preregistered experiments investigated whether children (3-12-year-olds; n = 456) and adults (n = 120) from the United States more negatively evaluate child characters who tell "emotionally hurtful lies"- lies explicitly told knowing that it will make another person feel bad - to a friend than to a more distant social partner. When children and adults judged one independent emotionally hurtful lie (Study 1), they evaluated it negatively regardless of whether the liar was lying to a friend, a classmate, or an enemy. However, when comparatively evaluating two people who told the same emotionally hurtful lie (at the same time), participants judged a friend's lie more negatively than a classmate's lie (Study 2).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF"It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol
June 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Center for Digestive Health, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Background: About half of the patients having colonoscopies experience procedure-related anxiety and emotional distress, which are associated with negative outcomes, including pain, higher sedation needs, longer procedure times, and avoidance of future care.
Objectives: To improve procedure quality, we sought to understand from the patient's perspective the emotional and psychological aspects of undergoing a colonoscopy and recommendations for improving care.
Design: Qualitative interview study.
Understanding the Influences of Cervical Screening Attendance among Women of Low Socioeconomic Position Using the Integrated Screening Action Model: A Qualitative Study.
Semin Oncol Nurs
June 2025
UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Objectives: People of lower socioeconomic position have a higher incidence of cervical cancer and lower uptake of cervical screening. The Integrated Screening Action Model considers how an individual's environment, capability, opportunity, and motivation influence screening engagement. This study explored the influences of attending cervical screening among women of low socioeconomic position living in Dublin, Ireland, between those who are underscreened and regularly screened.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDoctors Playing Lawyers: Lessons for Professional Regulation in Crisis.
Am J Law Med
March 2025
Professor of Healthcare Ethics and Law, University of Hertfordshire.
When someone gets in legal trouble in America, their case is almost invariably decided by a lawyer (a judge), lay people (a jury), or a combination of the two. Professional discipline, however, is a giant unexplained exception. In professional discipline matters, accusations of dangerous or incompetent practice are decided, usually in the first instance but always in the last, by state licensing boards composed of other members of the accused's profession.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF