A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cutaquig Is Well Tolerated in Immunodeficient Patients Who Did Not Tolerate Other Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Products. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment is generally tolerable, but some patients may experience adverse events to one or more SCIG products. We investigated whether 16.5% Cutaquig treatment offered a tolerable and safe alternative treatment for immunodeficient patients.

Methods: A one-year prospective cohort study was conducted at a single center in Ottawa, Canada. Adult immunodeficient patients who reported previous intolerability, adverse events, or other difficulty to other 20% SCIG product(s) were recruited to start on 16.5% Cutaquig. Treatment tolerability, safety, and quality of life were observed and described.

Results: Seven out of ten patients tolerated Cutaquig. There were no serious or severe adverse events related to the treatment. Three moderate infections were reported (two urinary tract infections and one injection site infection). The mean serum IgG level at the end of the study was comparable to baseline levels recorded before the study: 9.6 ± 4.5 vs. 7.6 ± 4.3 g/L, = 0.07. The overall health and health domain changes in the SF-36 and quality of life tests using the EQ visual analog scale improved by 21.5% ( = 0.38), 16.7% ( = 0.29), and 7.7% ( = 0.23), respectively.

Conclusions: Cutaquig may be used as an alternative treatment option for patients who did not tolerate 20% SCIG products.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680362PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep14040048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse events
12
scig products
12
immunodeficient patients
8
patients tolerate
8
subcutaneous immunoglobulin
8
165% cutaquig
8
cutaquig treatment
8
alternative treatment
8
20% scig
8
quality life
8

Similar Publications